Epstein Secrets

d I apologize to you for that. While I am =isappointed that you proactively communicated to all the participants =efore writing to Amelia, or me or Rachel, but what is done is done, and =t was probably inappropriate for me to ask you to write a follow-up =etter. It should be up to you to decide how you

epared her for the slanderous call =he received from them shortly after making false claims and asking why =he allowed me to be associated with the Bulletin. She understood that =he allegations were false and had been dealt with. Moreover, a lawyer =ho I had contracted because of concerns about Buzzfeed

font-family:Calibri,sans=serir>l think once we are all set, you can send me an email with your text= I'll post mine with a link to your email. OK? Rachel </=> Subject: Re: Krauss <=iv class="m_-6655043691561472585WordSectionl" style="font- family:Helvet=ca;font-size:12px;font-style:normal;font-variant

.com/> </=pan> =idly> <image001.png> <=div> <=iv> On Feb 27, 2018, at 12:32 PM, Rachel Bro=son < <mailto: »=wrote: This sentence: <1=> The Bulletin takes all claims of harassmen= seriously as well as believing in due process and will review carefully th= conclusions of any existing investigation

to issue anything before that. I think =nce we are all set, you can send me an email with your text. ='ll post mine with a link to your email. OK? Rachel From: Lawrence Krauss [mato Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2018 =:37 PM To: Rachel Bronson Cc: Lawrence Krauss - Gmail Subject: Re: Krauss <mailto

the making! April 5-9th 2018 — Visit for more info <image001.png> </=iv> On Feb 27, 2018, at 12:32 PM, Rachel Bronso =rote: This sentence: The Bulletin takes all claims of =arassment seriously as well as believing in due process and will review =arefully the conclusions of any existing investigation