Epstein Secrets

, announced his administration's move to ban transgender service members, and he used his account to announce that he had fired his chief of staff, Reince Priebus, and replaced him with John Kelly. "The president excluded the individual plaintiffs from government-controlled property when he used the blocking

nce that he had fired his chief of staff, Reince Priebus, and replaced him with John Kelly. "The presiden

tics from following him on Twitter is discriminatory and violates the First Amendment, a U.S. appeals court ruled Tuesday. The three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit upheld a lower court ruling against Trump. The plaintiffs, represented by the Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia Un

fers for an in-depth exploration of his rising influence: "Mulvaney spends considerably less time with Trump than his two previous chiefs of staff, Reince Priebus and John F. Kelly. And the president has sometimes kept him out of the loop when making contentious foreign policy decisions, advisers say. At a r

ent donor retreat in Chicago, Mulvaney told attendees that he does not seek to control the president's tweeting, time or family, one attendee said. Priebus and Kelly had clashed with the president over his Twitter statements and the influence of his eldest daughter and her husband. "Instead, Mulvaney h

urt the question of whether the rest of the law can remain without it. Amy Goldstein reports: "The long-awaited decision by a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit has little immediate practical effect on consumers because Congress already has removed the penalty for people who flout the in

nced his administration's move to ban transgender service members, and he used his account to announce that he had fired his chief of staff, Reince Priebus, and replaced him with John Kelly. "The president excluded the individual plaintiffs from government-controlled property when he used the blocking

tics from following him on Twitter is discriminatory and violates the First Amendment, a U.S. appeals court ruled Tuesday. The three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit upheld a lower court ruling against Trump. The plaintiffs, represented by the Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia Un