Epstein Secrets

gy, Pities College. 'Department of Psychology, California State University, Las Angeles; and ^Derailment of Psychology. California State University. Sacramento Psycholopc.al Science I -I6 0 The Authors) LOIS AnKle reuse guidelines sigcpub.conliournailtpeimmans DOI- I0.1 I77/216770260130742 wenvpsychol

der the relation of the event to one's life course (Berntsen & Rubin, 2006; Frankenhuis & Weenh, 2013); the emotional or taboo nature of the acts (Christianson, 1992; Goodman et al., 1990); meta-cognitive abilities (Koriat et al., 2000), especially in relation to schema-expected, plausible acts (Pezdek et

opardy in the courtroom: A scientific analysis of chiklren's testimony. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/10180- 000 Christianson, S. A. (1992). Emotional stress and eyewitness memory: A critical review. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 284-309. Connolly, I). A., Chong, K., Cobur

rthern Colorado, Greeley Wrongful Conviction Conference, Newport Beach, CA University of North Florida, Jacksonville California State University, Sacramento New York Medical College, Westchester, NY Memory and Reality Conference, FMS Foundation, White Plains, NY Innocence Project Conference, Cavanaugh

er, B.L. & Loftus, E.F. (1990). Jury selection in major controlled substance trials: The need for extended voir dire. Forensic Reports, 3, 331-348. Christianson, S-A. & Loftus, E.F. (1990). Some characteristics of peoples' traumatic memories. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 28(3), 195-198. Jobe, J. Whi

J., & Loftus, E.F. (1990). Determining damages: The influence of expert testimony on jurors' decision making. Law and Human Behavior, 14, 385-395. Christianson, S., Goodman, J., & Loftus, E.F. (1990). Eyewitness testimony. In Eysenck, M. (Ed.), The Blackwell Dictionary of Cognitive Psychology. Oxford, U.K.:

ail S. GotsImams Simone Gheiti," Robin S. Edelstein,3 Allison D. ReAllich,3 Ingrid M. Cordon,3 and David P.H. Jones(' ! California State University; Sacramento; 2Univenity of California, Irvine; 'University of California, Davis; 4Research Institute on. Judicial Systems, National Research Council, Bologna, I

aps because of their salience or distinctiveness. They may activate physiological (e.g., amygrIala; LeDoux, 2000) and behavioral (e.g., rehearsal; Christianson, 1992) responses that help con- solidate or maintain memories, possibly including memories for whole categories of experiences. Moreover, for highly