Epstein Secrets

17, Jimenez), Chicago Tribune (01/17, Meisner), People (01/17, Neumann), the Independent (01/17, Sharp), Forbes (01/17, Gleeson), Daily Mail (01/17, Potter), Fox News (01/17, Ruiz), New York Daily News (01/17, Wilkinson), Patch (01/17, Arnold), and WBBM (CBS-2) (01/17, Feurer, Molina, Perlman) also repo

s. Additional reporting on the story was provided by The Independent (01/17, Graziosi), New York Post (01/17, Christenson), The Daily Beast (01/17, Olmstead), Axios (01/17, Solender), Fax News (01/17, Elkind), New York Times (01/17, Karni), The Hill (01/17, Schnell), Forbes (01/17, Dorn), HuffPost (01/17

vided by ABC News (11/05, Katersky), Associated Press (11/05, Volmert), CBS News (11/05, Booth-Singleton), CNN (11/05, Morales), Daily Mail (11/05, Potter), Detroit News (11/05, Snell), Fox News (11/05, Ruiz), Detroit Free Press (11/05, Baldas), Independent (11/05, Keane), NBC News (11/05, Dienst), New

(11/05, Rubin), CNN (11/05, Rabinowitz, Polantz), The New York Post (11/05, Christenson), Reason Magazine (11/05, Sullum), The New Republic (11/05, Olmstead), Los Angeles Times (11/05, Tucker), Breitbart (11/05, Jordan), National Review (11/05, McCarthy), Tampa Free Press (11/05, Bolden), and Devdiscours

l discovery. In evaluating jurisdic- tional motions, district courts enjoy broad discretion in deciding whether to order discovery. See, eg., APWU v. Potter, 348 F.3d 619, 627 (2d Cir.2003) (noting a court may “devis[e] the procedures [to] ferret out the facts pertinent to jurisdiction”); Marine Midland B

ct or a lawful act performed in an unlawful man- ner.” N.Y. State Nat'l Org. for Women v. Terry, 886 F.2d 1839, 1361 (2d Cir.1989) (citing Ivancic v. Olmstead, 66 N.Y.2d 349, 352, 497 N.Y.S.2d 326, 488 N.E.2d 72 (1985)). To the extent that the Federal Plaintiffs sufficiently plead that Defen- dants acted in