Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ciable deterrence." United States v. Eldred, 933 F.3d 110, 118 (2d Cir. 2019) (quoting Herring v. United States, 555 U.S. 135, 141 (2009)); see also Herring, 555 U.S. at 144 (concluding that "[t]o trigger the exclusionary rule, police conduct must be sufficiently deliberate that exclusion can meaningful
n individual right and applies only where it results in appreciable deterrence." United States v. Eldred, 933 F.3d 110, 118 (2d Cir. 2019) (quoting Herring v. United States, 555 U.S. 135, 141 (2009)); see also Herring, 555 U.S. at 144 (concluding that "[t]o trigger the exclusionary rule, police conduct must be sufficie
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ciable deterrence." United States v. Eldred, 933 F.3d 110, 118 (2d Cir. 2019) (quoting Herring v. United States, 555 U.S. 135, 141 (2009)); see also Herring, 555 U.S. at 144 (concluding that "[t]o trigger the exclusionary rule, police conduct must be sufficiently deliberate that exclusion can meaningful
n individual right and applies only where it results in appreciable deterrence." United States v. Eldred, 933 F.3d 110, 118 (2d Cir. 2019) (quoting Herring v. United States, 555 U.S. 135, 141 (2009)); see also Herring, 555 U.S. at 144 (concluding that "[t]o trigger the exclusionary rule, police conduct must be sufficie
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ciable deterrence." United States v. Eldred, 933 F.3d 110, 118 (2d Cir. 2019) (quoting Herring v. United States, 555 U.S. 135, 141 (2009)); see also Herring, 555 U.S. at 144 (concluding that "[t]o trigger the exclusionary rule, police conduct must be sufficiently deliberate that exclusion can meaningful
n individual right and applies only where it results in appreciable deterrence." United States v. Eldred, 933 F.3d 110, 118 (2d Cir. 2019) (quoting Herring v. United States, 555 U.S. 135, 141 (2009)); see also Herring, 555 U.S. at 144 (concluding that "[t]o trigger the exclusionary rule, police conduct must be sufficie
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ciable deterrence." United States v. Eldred, 933 F.3d 110, 118 (2d Cir. 2019) (quoting Herring v. United States, 555 U.S. 135, 141 (2009)); see also Herring, 555 U.S. at 144 (concluding that "[t]o trigger the exclusionary rule, police conduct must be sufficiently deliberate that exclusion can meaningful
n individual right and applies only where it results in appreciable deterrence." United States v. Eldred, 933 F.3d 110, 118 (2d Cir. 2019) (quoting Herring v. United States, 555 U.S. 135, 141 (2009)); see also Herring, 555 U.S. at 144 (concluding that "[t]o trigger the exclusionary rule, police conduct must be sufficie
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (253)
Entities connected to both Herring and Herring v. United States
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON15 w/ Herring·4 w/ Herring
United States
LOCATION10 w/ Herring·4 w/ Herring
Bradley Edwards
PERSON10 w/ Herring·4 w/ Herring
JD
Jane Doe
PERSON10 w/ Herring·4 w/ Herring
MF
Maria Farmer
PERSON10 w/ Herring·3 w/ Herring
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON9 w/ Herring·4 w/ Herring
Kentucky
LOCATION8 w/ Herring·4 w/ Herring
Virginia Giuffre
PERSON9 w/ Herring·3 w/ Herring
George Mitchell
PERSON8 w/ Herring·4 w/ Herring
Michigan
LOCATION7 w/ Herring·4 w/ Herring
David Boies
PERSON7 w/ Herring·4 w/ Herring
Murphy
PERSON7 w/ Herring·4 w/ Herring
Oregon
LOCATION7 w/ Herring·4 w/ Herring
Chris Tucker
PERSON7 w/ Herring·4 w/ Herring
MW
Martin Weinberg
PERSON7 w/ Herring·4 w/ Herring
SW
Sweet
PERSON6 w/ Herring·4 w/ Herring
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATION6 w/ Herring·4 w/ Herring
Stephen Hawking
PERSON6 w/ Herring·4 w/ Herring
Minnesota
LOCATION6 w/ Herring·4 w/ Herring
Ross Gow
PERSON6 w/ Herring·4 w/ Herring