Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ciable deterrence." United States v. Eldred, 933 F.3d 110, 118 (2d Cir. 2019) (quoting Herring v. United States, 555 U.S. 135, 141 (2009)); see also Herring, 555 U.S. at 144 (concluding that "[t]o trigger the exclusionary rule, police conduct must be sufficiently deliberate that exclusion can meaningful
or can a conviction rest on answers that are literally true but unresponsive, and therefore "arguably misleading by negative implication." Id.; see Bronston v. United States, 409 U.S. 352, 362 (1973). But when "the answer is false, the fact that it is unresponsive is immaterial." United States v. Corr, 5
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ciable deterrence." United States v. Eldred, 933 F.3d 110, 118 (2d Cir. 2019) (quoting Herring v. United States, 555 U.S. 135, 141 (2009)); see also Herring, 555 U.S. at 144 (concluding that "[t]o trigger the exclusionary rule, police conduct must be sufficiently deliberate that exclusion can meaningful
or can a conviction rest on answers that are literally true but unresponsive, and therefore "arguably misleading by negative implication." Id.; see Bronston v. United States, 409 U.S. 352, 362 (1973). But when "the answer is false, the fact that it is unresponsive is immaterial." United States v. Corr, 5
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ciable deterrence." United States v. Eldred, 933 F.3d 110, 118 (2d Cir. 2019) (quoting Herring v. United States, 555 U.S. 135, 141 (2009)); see also Herring, 555 U.S. at 144 (concluding that "[t]o trigger the exclusionary rule, police conduct must be sufficiently deliberate that exclusion can meaningful
or can a conviction rest on answers that are literally true but unresponsive, and therefore "arguably misleading by negative implication." Id.; see Bronston v. United States, 409 U.S. 352, 362 (1973). But when "the answer is false, the fact that it is unresponsive is immaterial." United States v. Corr, 5
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ciable deterrence." United States v. Eldred, 933 F.3d 110, 118 (2d Cir. 2019) (quoting Herring v. United States, 555 U.S. 135, 141 (2009)); see also Herring, 555 U.S. at 144 (concluding that "[t]o trigger the exclusionary rule, police conduct must be sufficiently deliberate that exclusion can meaningful
or can a conviction rest on answers that are literally true but unresponsive, and therefore "arguably misleading by negative implication." Id.; see Bronston v. United States, 409 U.S. 352, 362 (1973). But when "the answer is false, the fact that it is unresponsive is immaterial." United States v. Corr, 5
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (292)
Entities connected to both Herring and Boston
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON15 w/ Herring·61 w/ Boston
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON9 w/ Herring·17 w/ Boston
United States
LOCATION10 w/ Herring·15 w/ Boston
MW
Martin Weinberg
PERSON7 w/ Herring·16 w/ Boston
Bradley Edwards
PERSON10 w/ Herring·12 w/ Boston
JD
Jane Doe
PERSON10 w/ Herring·11 w/ Boston
MF
Maria Farmer
PERSON10 w/ Herring·11 w/ Boston
Virginia Giuffre
PERSON9 w/ Herring·10 w/ Boston
Oregon
LOCATION7 w/ Herring·12 w/ Boston
the Southern District
LOCATION6 w/ Herring·12 w/ Boston
George Mitchell
PERSON8 w/ Herring·10 w/ Boston
Michigan
LOCATION7 w/ Herring·10 w/ Boston
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON5 w/ Herring·12 w/ Boston
North Carolina
LOCATION5 w/ Herring·12 w/ Boston
Sacramento
LOCATION6 w/ Herring·11 w/ Boston
Palm Beach
LOCATION3 w/ Herring·14 w/ Boston
Adriana Ross
PERSON5 w/ Herring·11 w/ Boston
David Boies
PERSON7 w/ Herring·9 w/ Boston
Minnesota
LOCATION6 w/ Herring·10 w/ Boston
SW
Sweet
PERSON6 w/ Herring·10 w/ Boston