Epstein Secrets

United States District Court, District of Columbia. In re INTERESTED PARTY 1 and In re Interested Party 2, In the Matter of United States v. Qantas Airways Limited. Misc. No. 07-567(JDB). Jan.

ified by name, where language of plea agreement did not, either expressly or impliedly, describe named employees as engaging in any wrongdoing. 181 Federal Courts 170B 685 170B Federal Courts 170BVIII Courts of Appeals 170BVIII(F) Effect of Transfer and Supersedeas or Stay 170Bk684 Supersedeas or Stay of Pr

f any criminal investigation related to past conduct as Senate aide and to immunize him from future prosecution. United States District Court for District of Columbia dismissed complaint, and plaintiff appealed. Holdings: The Court of Appeals held that: (1) plaintiff was not entitled to injunctive relief, and (

branch from fling indictment. Reversed and remanded. al on Count Five should be reversed. EFTA00191797 178 442 FEDERAL REPORTER, 3d SERIES 1. Federal Courts er•754.1, 814.1 District court's grant or denial of per- manent injunction is reviewed for abuse of discretion, while its underlying legal con- clu

tidistrict Litigation Panel, district court was required to evalu- ate motions to dismiss on merits de novo, and was bound by Second Circuit law, not District of Columbia law, which was ap- plied by the other district court. 28 U.S.C.A. § 1407; Fed.Rules Civ.Proc.Rule 12(b), 28 U.S.C.A. 2. International Law <-10.38 U

). 32. International Law <-10.32 A waiver of Foreign Sovereign Immu- nities Act (FSIA) immunity must be ex- plicit. 28 U.S.C.A. § 1602 et seq. 33. Federal Courts <=96 Because motions to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction were brought before discovery and decided without evidentiary hearing, plaintiffs