Epstein Secrets

DPNR caused a written cease and desist order, =-02-16-STT, dated October 28, 2016, to be served on counsel for GSJ via email and delivered to GSJ's Red Hook office on October 31, 2016 (the "Cease and Desist Order"). [EXHIBIT CI EFTA00583130 GS!, LLC v. DPNR et al. Civil No. / 2017 Complaint Page 5

owner was not on the island and that the GSJ personnel present had no authority to grant access to the island, and directed DPNR to GSJ's office in Red Hook. 18. Nevertheless, over the protests of GSJ personnel, and lacking any legal authority whatsoever, DPNR entered onto the premises of Great St. Jame

an arbitrary and unreasonably short cure period, all in clear violation of DPNR's obligations and GSJ's rights under the Settlement Agreement. 24. Emblematic, though not an exhaustive list, of alleged violations DPNR improperly asserted against GSJ in the Notice to Cure were the following: a. An alleged

2016, to EFTA00583144 GS!, LLC v. DPNR et aL Civil No. / 2017 Complaint Page 5 be served on counsel for GSJ via email and delivered to GSJ's Red Hook office on October 31, 2016 (the "Cease and Desist Order"). [EXHIBIT CI Erroneous Notice to Cure & the Arbitrary and Unreasonable Cure Period 21. O

owner was not on the island and that the GSJ personnel present had no authority to grant access to the island, and directed DPNR to GSJ's office in Red Hook. 18. Nevertheless, over the protests of GSJ personnel, and lacking any legal authority whatsoever, DPNR entered onto the premises of Great St. Jame

an arbitrary and unreasonably short cure period, all in clear violation of DPNR's obligations and GSJ's rights under the Settlement Agreement. 24. Emblematic, though not an exhaustive list, of alleged violations DPNR improperly asserted against GSJ in the Notice to Cure were the following: a. Alleged vio

a written cease and desist order, M02-16-STT, dated October 28, 2016, that was to be served on counsel for GSJ via email and was delivered to GSJ's Red Hook office on October 31, 2016 (the "Cease and Desist Order"). [EXHIBIT D] Erroneous Notice to Cure & the Arbitrary and Unreasonable Cure Period 33. O

owner was not on the island and that the GSJ personnel present had no authority to grant access to the island, and directed DPNR to GSJ's office in Red Hook. 29. Nevertheless, over the protests of GSJ personnel, and lacking any legal grettedsground or right whatsoever, DPNR illegally entered onto the pre

an arbitrary and unreasonably short cure period, all in clear violation of DPNR's obligations and GSJ's rights under the Settlement Agreement. 35. Emblematic, though not an exhaustive list, of alleged violations DPNR improperly asserted against GSJ in the Notice to Cure were the following: a. An alleged

written cease and desist order, IM-02-16-STT, dated October 28, 2016, that was to be served on counsel for GSJ via email and was delivered to GSJ's Red Hook office on October 31, 2016 (the "Cease and Desist Order"). [EXHIBIT DI Erroneous Notice to Cure & the Arbitrary and Unreasonable Cure Period EFTA0

owner was not on the island and that the GSJ personnel present had no authority to grant access to the island, and directed DPNR to GSJ's office in Red Hook. 21. Nevertheless, over the protests of GSJ personnel, and lacking any legal authority whatsoever, DPNR entered onto the premises of Great St. Jame

an arbitrary and unreasonably short cure period, all in clear violation of DPNR's obligations and GSJ's rights under the Settlement Agreement. 28. Emblematic, though not an exhaustive list, of alleged violations DPNR improperly asserted against GSJ in the Notice to Cure were the following: a. An alleged