5
Shared Docs
5
Same-Page
5 / 5
Mentions
f 28 private equity funds purchased through an SPV, providing exposure to buyout, special situations, venture capital and real estate strategies in North America, Europe and Asia. The number of funds and companies is an estimate and shows the aggregate of each deal at closing and may include some double coun
mber 30, 2017). The SOF Funds present comparatively strong Net IRR, DPI and TVPI across each vintage year. Exhibit 2: SOF Funds performance versus Cambridge Associates Secondary Fund Benchmark34, 35, 36, 37 In Exhibit 3, each of SOF, SOF D, SOF II and SOF III is benchmarked against its vintage group of top quartile buyout fund
f 28 private equity funds purchased through an SPV, providing exposure to buyout, special situations, venture capital and real estate strategies in North America, Europe and Asia. The number of funds and companies is an estimate and shows the aggregate of each deal at closing and may include some double coun
mber 30, 2017). The SOF Funds present comparatively strong Net IRR, DPI and TVPI across each vintage year. Exhibit 2: SOF Funds performance versus Cambridge Associates Secondary Fund Benchmark34, 35, 36, 37 In Exhibit 3, each of SOF, SOF D, SOF II and SOF III is benchmarked against its vintage group of top quartile buyout fund
f 28 private equity funds purchased through an SPV, providing exposure to buyout, special situations, venture capital and real estate strategies in North America, Europe and Asia. The number of funds and companies is an estimate and shows the aggregate of each deal at closing and may include some double coun
mber 30, 2017). The SOF Funds present comparatively strong Net IRR, DPI and TVPI across each vintage year. Exhibit 2: SOF Funds performance versus Cambridge Associates Secondary Fund Benchmark34, 35, 36, 37 In Exhibit 3, each of SOF, SOF D, SOF II and SOF III is benchmarked against its vintage group of top quartile buyout fund
f 28 private equity funds purchased through an SPV, providing exposure to buyout, special situations, venture capital and real estate strategies in North America, Europe and Asia. The number of funds and companies is an estimate and shows the aggregate of each deal at closing and may include some double coun
mber 30, 2017). The SOF Funds present comparatively strong Net IRR, DPI and TVPI across each vintage year. Exhibit 2: SOF Funds performance versus Cambridge Associates Secondary Fund Benchmark34, 35, 36, 37 In Exhibit 3, each of SOF, SOF D, SOF II and SOF III is benchmarked against its vintage group of top quartile buyout fund
f 28 private equity funds purchased through an SPV, providing exposure to buyout, special situations, venture capital and real estate strategies in North America, Europe and Asia. The number of funds and companies is an estimate and shows the aggregate of each deal at closing and may include some double coun
mber 30, 2017). The SOF Funds present comparatively strong Net IRR, DPI and TVPI across each vintage year. Exhibit 2: SOF Funds performance versus Cambridge Associates Secondary Fund Benchmark34, 35, 36, 37 In Exhibit 3, each of SOF, SOF D, SOF II and SOF III is benchmarked against its vintage group of top quartile buyout fund
Entities connected to both North America and Cambridge Associates Secondary Fund

United States
LOCATIONGlendower
LOCATION
Prince Charles
PERSON
Julie K. Brown
PERSON
New York
LOCATION
Deutsche Bank
ORGANIZATION
United Kingdom
LOCATION
Western Europe
LOCATIONGlendower Capital
ORGANIZATION
Madison
LOCATIONGlobal Corporate Finance
ORGANIZATION
Milan
LOCATION
University of Oxford
ORGANIZATION
J. Robert Oppenheimer
PERSON
Norway
LOCATION
University of Wisconsin-Madison
ORGANIZATION
New York University
ORGANIZATIONGallo & Co.
ORGANIZATIONCIBC Oppenheimer
ORGANIZATIONPaul Capital
ORGANIZATION