Epstein Secrets

cretion to consider Williams' timeliness argument [made for the first time in his appeal of the magistrate judge's order]," citing United States v. Howell, 231 F.3d 615 (9th Cir. 2000)). 1 While some referencing on the Court's part will be necessary, allowing the redacted filing will allow for better

d 480. 6. Moreover, to the extent any of Epstein's arguments are considered "new," the Court has the discretion to entertain same. See Williams v. McNeil, 557 F.3d 1287, 1292 (I Ith Cir. 2009) (noting that "the district court aclmowledged that it had discretion to consider Williams' timeliness argume

itial hearing, and save its knockout punch for the second round.” Williams v. McNeil, 557 F.3d 1287, 1292 (11th Cir. 2009) (quoting United States v. Howell, 231 F.3d 615, 622 (9th Cir. 2000). Thus, the District Court has discretion to refuse to consider Defendant’s argument that is raised for the first

re dress rehearsal if a party were allowed to feint and weave at the initial hearing, and save its knockout punch for the second round.” Williams v. McNeil, 557 F.3d 1287, 1292 (11th Cir. 2009) (quoting United States v. Howell, 231 F.3d 615, 622 (9th Cir. 2000). Thus, the District Court has discretion t

ange while flouting the most basic scientific evidence about disease transmission." However, in more favorable coverage, the Washington Times (7/4, Howell, Boyer, 492K) reports the President "used the second edition of his `Salute to America' to defend everyone from Christopher Columbus to law enforce

ulation data suggests the country's death toll could exceed 50,000. In an analysis considering the coronavirus death toll, the New York Times (7/4, McNeil, 18.61M) highlights that after the WHO last week "held a two-day online meeting of 1,300 scientists from around the world, the agency's chief scien