Epstein Secrets

ount of $475,157,340 and a $1 million fine. United States v, Hoffenberg, 94 Cr. 213 (RWS) (Docket # 149). In au Order dated December 11, 2013, Judge Sweet modified the terms of Hoffenberg's supervised release to impose, among other restrictions, a prohibition from engaging in direct contact with his vi

q. of the law firm Mintz & Fraade, P.C., commenced these proceedings.1 Their petition names as the sole respondent the "United States of America by the U.S. Probation Office New York City Staff." The sole claim is asserted under the Crime Victims' Rights Act ("CVRA"), 18 U.S.C. § 3771, Hoffenbcrg has been convicted of c

ount of $475,157,340 and a $1 million fine. United States v. Hoffenberg, 94 Cr. 213 (RWS) (Docket # 149). In an Order dated December 11, 2013, Judge Sweet modified the terms of Hoffenberg's supervised release to impose, among other restrictions, a prohibition front engaging in direct contact with his v

q. of the law firm Mintz & Fraade, P.C., commenced these proceedings.I Their petition names as the sole respondent the "United States of America by the U.S. Probation Office New York City Staff." The sole claim is asserted under the Crime Victims' Rights Act ("CVRA"), 18 U.S.C. § 3771, I Hof enberg has been convicted of

d" see18 U.S.C. S 3771(a)(2). This violation was enumerated in the Petition. 19. Based upon that sealed application by the Probation Office, Judge Sweet ordered a status conference for December 5, 2013. The Petition was directly related to the December 5, 2013 Status Conference Regarding Steven Hoff

ding in the district court involving, release, plea, sentencing, or any other parole proceeding." The government, through its agent, Michael Cox of the U.S. Probation Office, and the sealing of the documents in the instant related proceeding against Mr. Hoffenberg had been attempting to deny the victims of their right t