Epstein Secrets

ount of $475,157,340 and a $1 million fine. United States v, Hoffenberg, 94 Cr. 213 (RWS) (Docket # 149). In au Order dated December 11, 2013, Judge Sweet modified the terms of Hoffenberg's supervised release to impose, among other restrictions, a prohibition from engaging in direct contact with his vi

& Fraade, P.C., commenced these proceedings.1 Their petition names as the sole respondent the "United States of America by the U.S. Probation Office New York City Staff." The sole claim is asserted under the Crime Victims' Rights Act ("CVRA"), 18 U.S.C. § 3771, Hoffenbcrg has been convicted of conspiracy to commit

ount of $475,157,340 and a $1 million fine. United States v. Hoffenberg, 94 Cr. 213 (RWS) (Docket # 149). In an Order dated December 11, 2013, Judge Sweet modified the terms of Hoffenberg's supervised release to impose, among other restrictions, a prohibition front engaging in direct contact with his v

& Fraade, P.C., commenced these proceedings.I Their petition names as the sole respondent the "United States of America by the U.S. Probation Office New York City Staff." The sole claim is asserted under the Crime Victims' Rights Act ("CVRA"), 18 U.S.C. § 3771, I Hof enberg has been convicted of conspiracy to conun

l Ponzi scheme. Mr. Hoffenberg was sentenced to 20 years in prison, and ordered to pay almost $500 million in restitution. At his sentencing, Judge Sweet described Mr. Hoffenberg as an "unstable individual with manic tendencies and a sense of grandiosity." (Ex. B at *14.) Judge Sweet found that Mr. Ho

ued filing unsuccessful Towers Financial related litigation. See, e.g, 200,000 Towers Invirs Restitution Victims v. CI.S. ex rel. U.S. Prob. Office New York City Staff Breach of Crime Victims Act, No. 13 CIV. 8563 PKC, 2013 WL 6673612, at *2 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 18, 2013) (Hoffenberg's counsel ordered to show cause why