Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
a were the defendant's denials of various sexual activities, not honest answers that would have been quite different. In part for that reason, Judge Sweet authorized the deposition at the outset. Second, the Government was not a party to the civil unsealing litigation and did not have an opportunity t
is case are far removed from the "narrow" circumstances in which the Supreme Court has found an exception to the third party doctrine. For example, the Carpenter Court, while stressing that its holding was a "narrow one," 138 S. Ct. at 2220, held that "[g]iven the unique nature ofcell phone location records," which
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
a were the defendant's denials of various sexual activities, not honest answers that would have been quite different. In part for that reason, Judge Sweet authorized the deposition at the outset. Second, the Government was not a party to the civil unsealing litigation and did not have an opportunity t
is case are far removed from the "narrow" circumstances in which the Supreme Court has found an exception to the third party doctrine. For example, the Carpenter Court, while stressing that its holding was a "narrow one," 138 S. Ct. at 2220, held that "[g]iven the unique nature of cell phone location records," whic
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
a were the defendant's denials of various sexual activities, not honest answers that would have been quite different. In part for that reason, Judge Sweet authorized the deposition at the outset. Second, the Government was not a party to the civil unsealing litigation and did not have an opportunity t
is case are far removed from the "narrow" circumstances in which the Supreme Court has found an exception to the third party doctrine. For example, the Carpenter Court, while stressing that its holding was a "narrow one," 138 S. Ct. at 2220, held that "[g]iven the unique nature of cell phone location records," whic
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
a were the defendant's denials of various sexual activities, not honest answers that would have been quite different. In part for that reason, Judge Sweet authorized the deposition at the outset. Second, the Government was not a party to the civil unsealing litigation and did not have an opportunity t
is case are far removed from the "narrow" circumstances in which the Supreme Court has found an exception to the third party doctrine. For example, the Carpenter Court, while stressing that its holding was a "narrow one," 138 S. Ct. at 2220, held that "[g]iven the unique nature of cell phone location records," whic
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (252)
Entities connected to both Sweet and the Carpenter Court
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON115 w/ Sweet·4 w/ the
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON95 w/ Sweet·4 w/ the
David Boies
PERSON48 w/ Sweet·4 w/ the
Julie K. Brown
PERSON43 w/ Sweet·4 w/ the
Virginia Giuffre
PERSON43 w/ Sweet·2 w/ the
United States
LOCATION35 w/ Sweet·4 w/ the
Bradley Edwards
PERSON35 w/ Sweet·4 w/ the
JP
Jeffrey Pagliuca
PERSON28 w/ Sweet·4 w/ the
JD
Jane Doe
PERSON28 w/ Sweet·3 w/ the
MA
Martindell
PERSON27 w/ Sweet·4 w/ the
the Southern District
LOCATION27 w/ Sweet·4 w/ the
Colorado
LOCATION26 w/ Sweet·4 w/ the
Stephen Hawking
PERSON24 w/ Sweet·4 w/ the
CM
Colleen McMahon
PERSON22 w/ Sweet·4 w/ the
LP
Loretta A. Preska
PERSON21 w/ Sweet·4 w/ the
MF
Maria Farmer
PERSON19 w/ Sweet·4 w/ the
Southern District of New York
ORGANIZATION19 w/ Sweet·4 w/ the
MW
Martin Weinberg
PERSON18 w/ Sweet·4 w/ the
SD
Subpoena Duces
PERSON17 w/ Sweet·4 w/ the
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON17 w/ Sweet·4 w/ the