Epstein Secrets

ount of $475,157,340 and a $1 million fine. United States v, Hoffenberg, 94 Cr. 213 (RWS) (Docket # 149). In au Order dated December 11, 2013, Judge Sweet modified the terms of Hoffenberg's supervised release to impose, among other restrictions, a prohibition from engaging in direct contact with his vi

he obstruction by the United States Government which is alleged herein ...." (Petition at 3.) Remarkably, the Mintz & Fraade retainer agreement with Marques states, "We hereby advise 3 According to the petition, Hoffenberg also has filed an application with Judge Sweet that seeks permission "to leave th

ount of $475,157,340 and a $1 million fine. United States v. Hoffenberg, 94 Cr. 213 (RWS) (Docket # 149). In an Order dated December 11, 2013, Judge Sweet modified the terms of Hoffenberg's supervised release to impose, among other restrictions, a prohibition front engaging in direct contact with his v

obstruction by the United States Government which is alleged herein .. . ." (Petition at 3.) Remarkably, the Mintz & Fraade retainer agreement with Marques states, "We hereby advise 3 According to the petition, Hoffenberg also has filed an application with Judge Sweet that seeks permission "to leave th

d" see18 U.S.C. S 3771(a)(2). This violation was enumerated in the Petition. 19. Based upon that sealed application by the Probation Office, Judge Sweet ordered a status conference for December 5, 2013. The Petition was directly related to the December 5, 2013 Status Conference Regarding Steven Hoff

to Mr. Hoffenberg which if collected Mr. Hoffenberg could become a source through which Mr. Hoffenberg could begin to pay his restitution. 22. Mr. Marques was concerned that the restrictions being imposed would restrain Mr. Hoffenberg from performing his restitution efforts. Due to the urgency of the i