Epstein Secrets

d to use or promote the same unlawful activity. Accordingly, one could charge Epstein alone with individual counts ofviolating Section 1960 for each Western Union transfer and for each ATM withdrawal that occurred immediately prior to one of Banasiak's documented payments to one of the girls. I decided not to

Overt Acts based upon Activity with Jane Doe #2 93. On or about February 3, 2005, Defendants EPSTEIN, a and 37 EFTA02857560 1.1=Miraveled from Columbus, Ohio, to Palm Beach County, Florida, aboard the Boeing 727 aircraft owned by Defendant JEGE, INC. 95. On or about February 6, 2005, EPSTEIN and ca

hat I forego the Section 1956 charge and, instead, charge Epstein with aiding and abetting the unlicensed money transmitting by causing his bank and Western Union unwittingly to transmit funds intended to be used to promote and support sex trafficking and white slave traffic. The Money Laundering Section refe

A on April 6, 2005. 1. Overt Acts based upon Activity with Jane Doe #16 93. On or about February 3, 2005, Defendants EPSTEIN, , and traveled from Columbus, Ohio, to Palm Beach County, Florida, aboard the Boeing 727 aircraft owned by Defendant JEGE, INC. 95. On or about February 6, 2005, EPSTEIN and c

stern Union were the innocent intermediaries who operated the money transmitting business. Nonetheless, Epstein's directions to pay the girls caused Western Union to transmit funds that were intended to be used to promote or support unlawful activity — the prostitution of minors. Epstein's directions to Banasi

on April 6, 2005. Charges Based on Activity with Jane Doe #2. 1. Overt Acts On or about February 3, 2005, Defendants EPSTEIN, and traveled from Columbus, Ohio, to Palm Beach County, Florida, aboard the Boeing 727 aircraft owned dresses, went downstairs, and left with EFTA02857829 by Defendant JEGE