Epstein Secrets

ted PBIA on April 6, 2005. 1. Overt Acts based upon Activity with Jane Doe #2 On or about February 3, 2005, Defendants EPSTEIN, and traveled from Columbus, Ohio, to Palm Beach County, Florida, aboard the Boeing 727 aircraft owned by Defendant JEGE, INC. . On or about February 6, 2005, EPSTEIN and c

ther sections of the Mann Act shows that Congress likewise did not intend to require proof of knowledge of age to violate those sections either. See Gustafson v. Alloyd Co., Inc. , 513 U.S. 561, 570 (1995) (noting the "normal rule of statutory construction" that "identical worth used in different parts of the same act are in

her sections of the Mann Act shows that Congress likewise did not intend to require proof of knowledge of age to violate those sections either. See Gustafson v. Alloyd Co., Inc., 513 U.S. 561, 570 (1995) (noting the "normal rule of statutory construction" that "identical words used in different parts of the same act are int

Overt Acts based upon Activity with Jane Doe #2 93. On or about February 3, 2005, Defendants EPSTEIN, a and 37 EFTA02857560 1.1=Miraveled from Columbus, Ohio, to Palm Beach County, Florida, aboard the Boeing 727 aircraft owned by Defendant JEGE, INC. 95. On or about February 6, 2005, EPSTEIN and ca

ther sections of the Mann Act shows that Congress likewise did not intend to require proof of knowledge of age to violate those sections either. See Gustafson v. Alloyd Co., Inc. , 513 U.S. 561, 570 (1995) (noting the "normal rule of statutory construction" that "identical words used in different parts of the same act are in

A on April 6, 2005. 1. Overt Acts based upon Activity with Jane Doe #16 93. On or about February 3, 2005, Defendants EPSTEIN, , and traveled from Columbus, Ohio, to Palm Beach County, Florida, aboard the Boeing 727 aircraft owned by Defendant JEGE, INC. 95. On or about February 6, 2005, EPSTEIN and c

ther sections of the Mann Act shows that Congress likewise did not intend to require proof of knowledge of age to violate those sections either. See Gustafson v. Alloyd Co., Inc. , 513 U.S. 561, 570 (1995) (noting the "normal rule of statutory construction" that "identical words used in different parts of the same act are in

on April 6, 2005. Charges Based on Activity with Jane Doe #2. 1. Overt Acts On or about February 3, 2005, Defendants EPSTEIN, and traveled from Columbus, Ohio, to Palm Beach County, Florida, aboard the Boeing 727 aircraft owned dresses, went downstairs, and left with EFTA02857829 by Defendant JEGE