Epstein Secrets

ted PBIA on April 6, 2005. 1. Overt Acts based upon Activity with Jane Doe #2 On or about February 3, 2005, Defendants EPSTEIN, and traveled from Columbus, Ohio, to Palm Beach County, Florida, aboard the Boeing 727 aircraft owned by Defendant JEGE, INC. . On or about February 6, 2005, EPSTEIN and c

unpersuaded: The calls were not accidentally or incidentally placed, but rather were made knowingly to further a scheme. . . . Accordingly, whether Drury knew or intended that they would travel across state lines is immaterial. Id. at 1313. In Drury , the Eleventh Circuit did not address whether the

hone call was between states) or purely intrastate in nature ( i.e. , the telephone call was made to another telephone within the same state)."). In Drury , the defendant used his land-line telephone to call an undercover agent's cellular telephone. Although both the defendant and the agent were in Ge

unpersuaded: The calls were not accidentally or incidentally placed, but rather were made knowingly to further a scheme. . . . Accordingly, whether Drury knew or intended that they would travel across state lines is immaterial. Id. at 1313. In Drury, the Eleventh Circuit did not address whether the d

Overt Acts based upon Activity with Jane Doe #2 93. On or about February 3, 2005, Defendants EPSTEIN, a and 37 EFTA02857560 1.1=Miraveled from Columbus, Ohio, to Palm Beach County, Florida, aboard the Boeing 727 aircraft owned by Defendant JEGE, INC. 95. On or about February 6, 2005, EPSTEIN and ca

unpersuaded: The calls were not accidentally or incidentally placed, but rather were made knowingly to further a scheme. . . . Accordingly, whether Drury knew or intended that they would travel across state lines is immaterial. Id. at 1313. In Drury , the Eleventh Circuit did not address whether the

A on April 6, 2005. 1. Overt Acts based upon Activity with Jane Doe #16 93. On or about February 3, 2005, Defendants EPSTEIN, , and traveled from Columbus, Ohio, to Palm Beach County, Florida, aboard the Boeing 727 aircraft owned by Defendant JEGE, INC. 95. On or about February 6, 2005, EPSTEIN and c

unpersuaded: The calls were not accidentally or incidentally placed, but rather were made knowingly to further a scheme. . . . Accordingly, whether Drury knew or intended that they would travel across state lines is immaterial. Id. at 1313. In Drury , the Eleventh Circuit did not address whether the

on April 6, 2005. Charges Based on Activity with Jane Doe #2. 1. Overt Acts On or about February 3, 2005, Defendants EPSTEIN, and traveled from Columbus, Ohio, to Palm Beach County, Florida, aboard the Boeing 727 aircraft owned dresses, went downstairs, and left with EFTA02857829 by Defendant JEGE