Epstein Secrets

led to allege spe- cific tort or place tort occurred); Kline, 685 F.Supp. at 391 (finding tort exception inapplicable where victim was abducted in Mexico City and brought to the United 25. Judge Robertson recognized the same diffi- culty. Although he did consider Plaintiffs's claims under the tort excepti

or a tort (3) committed in violation of the law of nations (i.e., international law)." Kadic v. Karad- zic, 70 FM 232, 238 (2d Cir.1995); see also Flores v. Southern Peru Corp, 343 F.3d 140, 143 n. 2 (2d Cir2003). Certain Plaintiffs in these actions are aliens and the complaints all allege common la

y removed from a collection of documents about a Spanish expedition to Central America in 1527 that is housed in the Archivo General de la Nacion in Mexico City, Mexico. The article stated that in the early 1990s, the manuscript was sold by an auction house in California, United States. From there, it passed

N THE NEWS Justice Department Sues Texas Over Border Buoy Barrier The Associated Press (07/24, Weber, Gonzalez) and the Wall Street Journal (07/24, Flores) reported that on Monday, the Justice Department made good on its threat to sue Texas Gov. Greg Abbott if he did not remove a floating buoy barrier

also appeared to be members of the same cartel. The two were arrested during raids in the northern border state of Tamaulipas on Sunday and flown to Mexico City on a military plane. It was not immediately clear why the arrests were not announced at the time. The article added that federal prosecutors did no

Salgado, Hesson), CBS News (05/11, Montoya-Galvez), NBC News (05/11, Korecki, Seitz-Wald), Fox News (05/11, Hayes, Hagstrom), CNN (05/11, Salahieh, Flores), USA TODAY (05/11, Villagran, Vanden Brook, et al.), Axios (05/11, Boodhoo), Politico (05/11, Crampton), Bloomberg (05/11, Fabian), Forbes (05/11,

failed to allege spe- cific tort or place tort occurred); Kline, 685 F.Supp. at 391 (finding tort exception inapplicable where victim was abducted in Mexico City and brought to the United 25. Judge Robertson recognized the same diffi- culty. Although he did consider Plaintiffs’s claims under the tort exceptio

for a tort (3) committed in violation of the law of nations (i.e., international law).” Kadic v. Karad- zic, 70 F.8d 232, 238 (2d Cir.1995); see also Flores v. Southern Peru Corp., 348 F.3d 140, 143 n. 2 (2d Cir.2003). Certain Plaintiffs in these actions are aliens and the complaints all allege common law