Epstein Secrets

led to allege spe- cific tort or place tort occurred); Kline, 685 F.Supp. at 391 (finding tort exception inapplicable where victim was abducted in Mexico City and brought to the United 25. Judge Robertson recognized the same diffi- culty. Although he did consider Plaintiffs's claims under the tort excepti

denying jurisdiction- al discovery where complaint was de- scribed as "sparse" and "conclusory")); see also Cornell v. Assicurazioni Genova S.p.A., Consolidated, Nos. 97 Civ. 2262, 98 Civ. 9186(MBM), 2000 WL 2W29, at *2 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 16, 2000) (granting motion to dismiss and denying request for juris- dic

in% Evonik Hong Kong Ltd. Hong Kong (Hong Kong) 100.00 Evonik India Pvt. Ltd. Mumbai (India) 100.00 Evonik Industries de Mexico, SA de C.V. Mexico City (Mexico) 100.00 Evonik International Holding B.V. Amsterdam (Netherlands) 100.00 Evonik Iran AG Teheran (Iran) 100.00 Evonik Italia Pandino

been calculated in accordance with Section 16 of the German Stock Corporation Act (AktG). Accordingly, the calculation includes shares held by the Consolidated subsidiaries Shareholding Name of company Registered office in% Consolidated subsidiaries Germany AQura GmbH Hanau • 100.00 BK-Wolfgang-Wa

failed to allege spe- cific tort or place tort occurred); Kline, 685 F.Supp. at 391 (finding tort exception inapplicable where victim was abducted in Mexico City and brought to the United 25. Judge Robertson recognized the same diffi- culty. Although he did consider Plaintiffs’s claims under the tort exceptio

denying jurisdiction- al discovery where complaint was de- scribed as “sparse” and “conclusory”)); see also Cornell v. Assicurazioni Generali S.p.A., Consolidated, Nos. 97 Civ. 2262, 98 Civ. 9186(MBM), 2000 WL 284222, at *2 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 16, 2000) (granting motion to dismiss and denying request for juris- dict