Epstein Secrets

. U.S. I McDarrah, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 48269 (S.D.N.Y. 2006); U.S. I McDarrah, 2007 LEXIS 6590 (S.D.N.Y. 2007) Internet FBI posted an ad on Craigslist advertising young girls for sex; defendant responded & offered money for oral sex with 13 yr-old but did not show; later defendant contacted same

or but instead undercover agent. Appellate court affirmed enhancement because pattern of activity used minor interchangeably with victim. U.S. I Manley, Slip Copy, 2007 WL 1379982 (11th Cir. 2007) Slip Copy Not for Publication Internet Internet chat room communications between father of 12 yr

U.S. v. McDarrah, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 48269 (S.D.N.Y. 2006); U.S. v. McDarrah, 2007 LEXIS 6590 (S.D.N.Y. 2007) Internet FBI posted an ad on Craigslist advertising young girls for sex; defendant responded & offered money for oral sex with 13 yr-old but did not show; later defendant contacted same

r but instead undercover agent. Appellate court affirmed enhancement because pattern of activity used minor interchangeably with victim. U.S. v. Manley, • Slip Copy, 2007 WL Slip Copy Not for Internet Internet chat room communications between father of 12 yr-old boy and 2422(6); 2252A(a)(1) &

79474 FCOURT CASES FACILITY. . FACTS/COMMUNICATION S CHARGE S.D.N.Y. U.S. v. McDarrah, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS Internet FBI posted an ad on Craigslist advertising young girls for sex; 2422(b) Sting 48269 (S.D.N.Y. 2006); U.S. v. McDarrah, 2007 LEXIS 6590 (S.D.N.Y. defendant responded & offere

r but instead undercover agent. Appellate court affirmed enhancement because pattern of activity used minor interchangeably with victim. U.S. v. Manley, Slip Copy, 2007 WL Slip Copy Not for Internet Internet chat room communications between father of 12 yr-old boy and 2422(b); 2252A(a)(1) & (

. U.S. I McDarrah, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 48269 (S.D.N.Y. 2006); U.S. I McDarrah, 2007 LEXIS 6590 (S.D.N.Y. 2007) Internet FBI posted an ad on Craigslist advertising young girls for sex; defendant responded & offered money for oral sex with 13 yr-old but did not show; later defendant contacted same

or but instead undercover agent. Appellate court affirmed enhancement because pattern of activity used minor interchangeably with victim. U.S.'. Manley, Slip Copy, 2007 WL Slip Copy Not for Internet Internet chat room communications between father of 12 yr-old boy and 2422(b); 2252A(a)(1) & (