Epstein Secrets

ce. The accompanying report of William Julie ("Julie Rep.") reviews the French extradition process as it would likely be applied to Ms. Maxwell. Mr. Julie is an expert on French extradition law who has handled extradition cases both within and outside the European Union and regularly appears as an ext

ns to the Court regarding the strength of its case. See, e.g., United States v. Stephens, 447 F. Supp. 3d 63, 65 (S.D.N.Y. 2020) 7 EFTA00065728 (Nathan, J.) (reconsidering bail decision based, in part, on evidence suggesting government's case weaker than alleged at initial hearing and concern about poss

ce. The accompanying report of William Julie ("Julie Rep.") reviews the French extradition process as it would likely be applied to Ms. Maxwell. Mr. Julie is an expert on French extradition law who has handled extradition cases both within and outside the European Union and regularly appears as an ext

ns to the Court regarding the strength of its case. See, e.g., United States v. Stephens, 447 F. Supp. 3d 63, 65 (S.D.N.Y. 2020) 7 EFTA00154524 (Nathan, J.) (reconsidering bail decision based, in part, on evidence suggesting government's case weaker than alleged at initial hearing and concern about poss

ce. The accompanying report of William Julie ("Julie Rep.") reviews the French extradition process as it would likely be applied to Ms. Maxwell. Mr. Julie is an expert on French extradition law who has handled extradition cases both within and outside the European Union and regularly appears as an ext

ns to the Court regarding the strength of its case. See, e.g., United States v. Stephens, 447 F. Supp. 3d 63, 65 (S.D.N.Y. 2020) 7 EFTA00094301 (Nathan, J.) (reconsidering bail decision based, in part, on evidence suggesting government's case weaker than alleged at initial hearing and concern about poss

amples of French courts deporting individuals who have lost French nationality following the commission of an offense. (Id. ¶ 21). Accordingly, Mr. Julie concludes: "[I]t cannot have been the intention of French lawmakers that Article 696-4 be construed as meaning that a person who has lost French na

t has recently considered and granted pretrial release under that section. See United States v. Stephens, 447 F. Supp. 3d 63,66-68 (S.D.N.Y. 2020) (Nathan, J.); but see Alderete, 336 F.R.D. at 268. 11 EFTA00093420 CaszEsc'. 27-U412[9496W ntCldeanik4103013D2FH1800120612aagaSeid b2 16 Complicating matter