Epstein Secrets

pe of mo- tion practice and caution counsel that "appellate motion practice is not a game of ping-pong In which the last lawyer to serve wins." See Sarasota County v. Ex, 645 So.2d 7 (Pia. 2d DCA 1994). To an even greater extent, we are extremely concerned with the impact of such behavior on children.

ng of motions and a brief by the Guardian in appellate proceedings conflicts with these functions, and violates the statutory prohibi- tion against Guardians acting as advocates. See§ 61.403 Fla. Stat. (1997); Scaringe v. Herrick, 711 So.2d at 204. Simply, the Guardian does not have a statutory right to

type of mo- tion practice and caution counsel that "appellate motion practice is not a game of ping-pong in which the last law to serve wins." See Sarasota County v. Ex, 645 ..2d 7 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994). To an even greater extent, we are extremely concerned with the impact of such behavior on children. C

ng of motions and a brief by the Guardian in appellate proceedings conflicts with these functions, and violates the statutory prohibi- tion against Guardians acting as advocates. See§ 1.403 Fla. Stat. (1997); Scaringe v. Herrick, 711 Eld at 204. Simply, the Guardian does not have a statutory right to ap

pe of mo- tion practice and caution counsel that "appellate motion practice is not a game of ping-pong in which the last lawyer to serve wins." See Sarasota County v. Lx, 645 So.2d 7 (Fla. 241 DCA 1994). To an even greater extent, we are extremely concerned with the impact of such behavior on children.

ng of motions and a brief by the Guardian in appellate proceedings conflicts with these functions, and violates the statutory prohibi- tion against Guardians acting as advocates. See§ 61.403 Fla. Stat. (1997); Scaringe v. Herrick. 711 So.2d at 204. Simply, the Guardian does not have a statutory right to