Epstein Secrets

ally Paul G. Cassell, Barbarians at the Gates? A Reply to the Critics of the Victims' Rights Amendment, 1999 Utah L. Rev. 479, 515-22 (discussing the Oklahoma City bombing case in greater detail). 47 See United States v. McVeigh, No. 96-CR-68, 1996 WL 366268, at 2 (D. Colo. June 26, 1996). 48 Td. at 2-3 (discu

the Victims' Rights Amendment, 1999 Utah L. Rev. 479, 515-22 (discussing the Oklahoma City bombing case in greater detail). 47 See United States v. McVeigh, No. 96-CR-68, 1996 WL 366268, at 2 (D. Colo. June 26, 1996). 48 Td. at 2-3 (discussing application of Fed. R. Evid. 615). 49 Motion of Marsha and

eported that the FBI broke down the Timothy McVeigh trial during a museum talk at the Oklahoma City National Memorial and Museum, 30 years after the Oklahoma City bombing. According to the article, lead agents Jon Hersley and Larry Tongate, who led the investigation, discussed the key pieces of evidence that

ccording to the article, lead agents Jon Hersley and Larry Tongate, who led the investigation, discussed the key pieces of evidence that pointed to McVeigh and Terry Nichols, including a card and earplugs found in McVeigh's possession. The article noted that the investigation, which was the largest in F

eported that the FBI broke down the Timothy McVeigh trial during a museum talk at the Oklahoma City National Memorial and Museum, 30 years after the Oklahoma City bombing. According to the article, lead agents Jon Henley and Larry Tongate, who led the investigation, discussed the key pieces of evidence that p

According to the article, lead agents Jon Henley and Larry Tongate, who led the investigation, discussed the key pieces of evidence that pointed to McVeigh and Terry Nichols, including a card and earplugs found in McVeigh's possession. The article noted that the investigation, which was the largest in F

o. 101-647, § 502(b) (1996). 2 Id. § 502(b)(1). 3 Id. § 502(b)(3). 24 Id. § 502(b)(5). 25 Id. § 502(b)(4). 26 Id. § 502(a). 27 United States v. McVeigh, 157 F.3d 809, 814-815 (10th Cir. 1998). See generally Cassell, Barbarians at the Gates, supra note 6, at 515-22 (discussing this case in greater det

his point is heightened by pre-CVRA caselaw questioning any right by a victim's representative to assert victims' rights. Most notably, in one of the Oklahoma City bombing prosecutions, the Tenth Circuit rebuked a trial judge for permitting an attorney for the bombing victims to participate in oral argument at a