Epstein Secrets

thanks.) But the double-concave lines of shin & aleph, in a sense the "most important" letters, are beautiful insofar as they're female. (And as the Zohar says [admittedly in aramaic], man--genuine man--exists only at the moment of sexual union, male+female; so man isn't so much a creature as an event

' Subject: Re: Date: Mon, 07 Dec 2009 16:04:49 +0000 or abstract the openess of some of the letters. tsadeh as dancing girl, khaf as a stroke in a Kline. On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 10:53 AM, David Gelemter > wrote: Actually did that once. Thinking about the curves just as curves, like the curves of a w

thanks.) But the double-concave lines of shin & aleph, in a sense the "most important" letters, are beautiful insofar as they're female. (And as the Zohar says [admittedly in aramaic], man--genuine man--exists only at the moment of sexual union, male+female; so man isn't so much a creature as an event

:04 AM, Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> wrote: or abstract the openess of some of the letters. tsadeh as dancing girl, khaf as a stroke in a Kline. On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 10:53 AM, David Gelemter < wrote: Actually did that once. Thinking about the curves just as curves, like the curves of a w

thanks.) But the double-concave lines of shin & aleph, in a sense the "most important" letters, are beautiful insofar as they're female. (And as the Zohar says [admittedly in aramaic], man--genuine man--exists only at the moment of sexual union, male+female; so man isn't so much a creature as an event

:04 AM, Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> wrote: or abstract the openess of some of the letters. tsadeh as dancing girl, khaf as a stroke in a Kline. On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 10:53 AM, David Gelemter H wrote: Actually did that once. Thinking about the curves just as curves, like the curves of a

thanks.) But the double-concave lines of shin & aleph, in a sense the "most important" letters, are beautiful insofar as they're female. (And as the Zohar says [admittedly in aramaic], man--genuine man--exists only at the moment of sexual union, male+female; so man isn't so much a creature as an event

Epstein Sent Mon 12/7/2009 4:04:49 PM Subject: Re: or abstract the openess of some of the letters. tsadeh as dancing girl, khaf as a stroke in a Kline. On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 10:53 AM, David Gelemter •: a> wrote: Actually did that once. Thinking about the curves just as curves, like the curves of

hanks.) But the double-concave lines of shin & aleph, in a sense the "most important" letters, are beautiful insofar as they're female. (And as the Zohar says [admittedly in aramaic], man--genuine man--exists only at the moment of sexual union, male+female; so man isn't so much a creature as an event,

04 AM, Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> wrote: or abstract the openess of some of the letters. tsadeh as dancing girl, khaf as a stroke in a Kline. On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 10:53 AM, David Gelemter <david.gelemter(gmail.com> wrote: Actually did that once. Thinking about the curves just as curves

hanks.) But the double-concave lines of shin & aleph, in a sense the "most important" letters, are beautiful insofar as they're female. (And as the Zohar says [admittedly in aramaic], man--genuine man--exists only at the moment of sexual union, male+female; so man isn't so much a creature as an event,

:04 AM, Jeffrey Epstein jeevacation@smail,com> wrote: or abstract the openess of some of the letters. tsadeh as dancing girl, khaf as a stroke in a Kline. On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 10:53 AM, David Gelemter <[email protected]> wrote: Actually did that once. Thinking about the curves just as curves

hanks.) But the double-concave lines of shin & aleph, in a sense the "most important" letters, are beautiful insofar as they're female. (And as the Zohar says [admittedly in aramaic], man--genuine man--exists only at the moment of sexual union, male+female; so man isn't so much a creature as an event,

4 AM, Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacation@gmail corn> wrote: or abstract the openess of some of the letters. tsadeh as dancing girl, khaf as a stroke in a Kline. On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 10:53 AM, David Gelemter < wrote: Actually did that once. Thinking about the curves just as curves, like the curves of a w