Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ited States v. Jessup, 757 F.2d 378, 384 (1st Cir.1985)). "The quantum of evidence required to rebut the presumption is not high." United States v. Thompson, No. 16-CR-00019, 2018 WL 447331, at *2 (M.D. Pa. Jan. 17, 2018) (citation omitted). "Any evidence favorable to a defendant that comes within a cat
dant spent only 22 days in the United States, that the charges against the defendant (violations of International Emergency Economic Powers Act and the Export Administration Regulations) "were serious and carried a potential for a significant period of incarceration" and that the "government has strong evidence against" the defenda
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ited States v. Jessup, 757 F.2d 378, 384 (1st Cir.1985)). "The quantum of evidence required to rebut the presumption is not high." United States v. Thompson, No. 16-CR-00019, 2018 WL 447331, at *2 (M.D. Pa. Jan. 17, 2018) (citation omitted). "Any evidence favorable to a defendant that comes within a cat
dant spent only 22 days in the United States, that the charges against the defendant (violations of International Emergency Economic Powers Act and the Export Administration Regulations) "were serious and carried a potential for a significant period of incarceration" and that the "government has strong evidence against" the defenda
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ited States v. Jessup, 757 F.2d 378, 384 (1st Cir.1985)). "The quantum of evidence required to rebut the presumption is not high." United States v. Thompson, No. 16-CR-00019, 2018 WL 447331, at *2 (M.D. Pa. Jan. 17, 2018) (citation omitted). "Any evidence favorable to a defendant that comes within a cat
dant spent only 22 days in the United States, that the charges against the defendant (violations of International Emergency Economic Powers Act and the Export Administration Regulations) "were serious and carried a potential for a significant period of incarceration" and that the "government has strong evidence against" the defenda
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ited States v. Jessup, 757 F.2d 378, 384 (1st Cir.1985)). "The quantum of evidence required to rebut the presumption is not high." United States v. Thompson, No. 16-CR-00019, 2018 WL 447331, at *2 (M.D. Pa. Jan. 17, 2018) (citation omitted). "Any evidence favorable to a defendant that comes within a cat
dant spent only 22 days in the United States, that the charges against the defendant (violations of International Emergency Economic Powers Act and the Export Administration Regulations) "were serious and carried a potential for a significant period of incarceration" and that the "government has strong evidence against" the defenda
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (128)
Entities connected to both Thompson and the Export Administration Regulations
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON193 w/ Thompson·6 w/ the
United States
LOCATION91 w/ Thompson·6 w/ the
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON86 w/ Thompson·3 w/ the
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATION83 w/ Thompson·5 w/ the
ET
Emmy Taylor
PERSON82 w/ Thompson·5 w/ the
George Mitchell
PERSON61 w/ Thompson·4 w/ the
Colorado
LOCATION56 w/ Thompson·4 w/ the
FBI
ORGANIZATION55 w/ Thompson·2 w/ the
the Southern District
LOCATION50 w/ Thompson·4 w/ the
Marc Rich
PERSON49 w/ Thompson·5 w/ the
New York
LOCATION47 w/ Thompson·5 w/ the
Samantha Power
PERSON42 w/ Thompson·3 w/ the
Phoenix
LOCATION37 w/ Thompson·2 w/ the
Bernie Sanders
PERSON33 w/ Thompson·4 w/ the
MW
Martin Weinberg
PERSON33 w/ Thompson·4 w/ the
Southern District of New York
ORGANIZATION32 w/ Thompson·4 w/ the
Reid Weingarten
PERSON31 w/ Thompson·4 w/ the
DB
Doug Band
PERSON31 w/ Thompson·4 w/ the
JD
Jane Doe
PERSON30 w/ Thompson·4 w/ the
Atlanta
LOCATION31 w/ Thompson·2 w/ the