Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ited States v. Jessup, 757 F.2d 378, 384 (1st Cir.1985)). "The quantum of evidence required to rebut the presumption is not high." United States v. Thompson, No. 16-CR-00019, 2018 WL 447331, at *2 (M.D. Pa. Jan. 17, 2018) (citation omitted). "Any evidence favorable to a defendant that comes within a cat
als at the Department of Justice reviewed the NPA and either authorized or helped negotiate the resolution of the matter. See, e.g., United States' Second Supplemental Privilege Log filed as Dkt. 329-1 in Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 v. United States, No. 08-CV-80736 (S.D. Fla.) (the "CVRA litigation") (illustrating the number o
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ited States v. Jessup, 757 F.2d 378, 384 (1st Cir.1985)). "The quantum of evidence required to rebut the presumption is not high." United States v. Thompson, No. 16-CR-00019, 2018 WL 447331, at *2 (M.D. Pa. Jan. 17, 2018) (citation omitted). "Any evidence favorable to a defendant that comes within a cat
als at the Department of Justice reviewed the NPA and either authorized or helped negotiate the resolution of the matter. See, e.g., United States' Second Supplemental Privilege Log filed as Dkt. 329-1 in Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 v. United States, No. 08-CV-80736 (S.D. Fla.) (the "CVRA litigation") (illustrating the number o
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ited States v. Jessup, 757 F.2d 378, 384 (1st Cir.1985)). "The quantum of evidence required to rebut the presumption is not high." United States v. Thompson, No. 16-CR-00019, 2018 WL 447331, at *2 (M.D. Pa. Jan. 17, 2018) (citation omitted). "Any evidence favorable to a defendant that comes within a cat
als at the Department of Justice reviewed the NPA and either authorized or helped negotiate the resolution of the matter. See, e.g., United States' Second Supplemental Privilege Log filed as Dkt. 329-1 in Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 v. United States, No. 08-CV-80736 (S.D. Fla.) (the "CVRA litigation") (illustrating the number o
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ited States v. Jessup, 757 F.2d 378, 384 (1st Cir.1985)). "The quantum of evidence required to rebut the presumption is not high." United States v. Thompson, No. 16-CR-00019, 2018 WL 447331, at *2 (M.D. Pa. Jan. 17, 2018) (citation omitted). "Any evidence favorable to a defendant that comes within a cat
als at the Department of Justice reviewed the NPA and either authorized or helped negotiate the resolution of the matter. See, e.g., United States' Second Supplemental Privilege Log filed as Dkt. 329-1 in Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 v. United States, No. 08-CV-80736 (S.D. Fla.) (the "CVRA litigation") (illustrating the number o
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (143)
Entities connected to both Thompson and Second Supplemental Privilege Log
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON193 w/ Thompson·8 w/ Second
United States
LOCATION91 w/ Thompson·8 w/ Second
ET
Emmy Taylor
PERSON82 w/ Thompson·7 w/ Second
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON86 w/ Thompson·3 w/ Second
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATION83 w/ Thompson·5 w/ Second
George W. Bush
PERSON74 w/ Thompson·3 w/ Second
George Mitchell
PERSON61 w/ Thompson·4 w/ Second
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATION60 w/ Thompson·3 w/ Second
Colorado
LOCATION56 w/ Thompson·4 w/ Second
Michael Jackson
PERSON56 w/ Thompson·3 w/ Second
the Southern District
LOCATION50 w/ Thompson·8 w/ Second
FBI
ORGANIZATION55 w/ Thompson·3 w/ Second
Marc Rich
PERSON49 w/ Thompson·5 w/ Second
New York
LOCATION47 w/ Thompson·4 w/ Second
Samantha Power
PERSON42 w/ Thompson·2 w/ Second
Phoenix
LOCATION37 w/ Thompson·2 w/ Second
Southern District of New York
ORGANIZATION32 w/ Thompson·7 w/ Second
JD
Jane Doe
PERSON30 w/ Thompson·8 w/ Second
Bernie Sanders
PERSON33 w/ Thompson·4 w/ Second
MW
Martin Weinberg
PERSON33 w/ Thompson·4 w/ Second