Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ited States v. Jessup, 757 F.2d 378, 384 (1st Cir.1985)). "The quantum of evidence required to rebut the presumption is not high." United States v. Thompson, No. 16-CR-00019, 2018 WL 447331, at *2 (M.D. Pa. Jan. 17, 2018) (citation omitted). "Any evidence favorable to a defendant that comes within a cat
§ 1591. See Fierro, 2012 WL 13042630, at *4 ("[T]he TVPA is inapplicable to individual purchasers of sex from trafficking victims...").1° I° While Fiero represents the law in this district, Mr. Epstein notes that there is a division of authority on the scope of § 1591. See United States v. Jungers, 7
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ited States v. Jessup, 757 F.2d 378, 384 (1st Cir.1985)). "The quantum of evidence required to rebut the presumption is not high." United States v. Thompson, No. 16-CR-00019, 2018 WL 447331, at *2 (M.D. Pa. Jan. 17, 2018) (citation omitted). "Any evidence favorable to a defendant that comes within a cat
§ 1591. See Fierro, 2012 WL 13042630, at *4 ("[T]he TVPA is inapplicable to individual purchasers of sex from trafficking victims...").1° I° While Fiero represents the law in this district, Mr. Epstein notes that there is a division of authority on the scope of § 1591. See United States v. Jungers, 7
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ited States v. Jessup, 757 F.2d 378, 384 (1st Cir.1985)). "The quantum of evidence required to rebut the presumption is not high." United States v. Thompson, No. 16-CR-00019, 2018 WL 447331, at *2 (M.D. Pa. Jan. 17, 2018) (citation omitted). "Any evidence favorable to a defendant that comes within a cat
§ 1591. See Fierro, 2012 WL 13042630, at *4 ("[T]he TVPA is inapplicable to individual purchasers of sex from trafficking victims...").1° I° While Fiero represents the law in this district, Mr. Epstein notes that there is a division of authority on the scope of § 1591. See United States v. Jungers, 7
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ited States v. Jessup, 757 F.2d 378, 384 (1st Cir.1985)). "The quantum of evidence required to rebut the presumption is not high." United States v. Thompson, No. 16-CR-00019, 2018 WL 447331, at *2 (M.D. Pa. Jan. 17, 2018) (citation omitted). "Any evidence favorable to a defendant that comes within a cat
§ 1591. See Fierro, 2012 WL 13042630, at *4 ("[T]he TVPA is inapplicable to individual purchasers of sex from trafficking victims...").1° I° While Fiero represents the law in this district, Mr. Epstein notes that there is a division of authority on the scope of § 1591. See United States v. Jungers, 7
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (133)
Entities connected to both Thompson and Fiero
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON193 w/ Thompson·4 w/ Fiero
United States
LOCATION91 w/ Thompson·5 w/ Fiero
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON86 w/ Thompson·3 w/ Fiero
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATION83 w/ Thompson·4 w/ Fiero
ET
Emmy Taylor
PERSON82 w/ Thompson·4 w/ Fiero
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON80 w/ Thompson·2 w/ Fiero
George W. Bush
PERSON74 w/ Thompson·2 w/ Fiero
George Mitchell
PERSON61 w/ Thompson·4 w/ Fiero
Colorado
LOCATION56 w/ Thompson·4 w/ Fiero
FBI
ORGANIZATION55 w/ Thompson·2 w/ Fiero
the Southern District
LOCATION50 w/ Thompson·4 w/ Fiero
Marc Rich
PERSON49 w/ Thompson·4 w/ Fiero
New York
LOCATION47 w/ Thompson·4 w/ Fiero
Samantha Power
PERSON42 w/ Thompson·2 w/ Fiero
Phoenix
LOCATION37 w/ Thompson·2 w/ Fiero
MW
Martin Weinberg
PERSON33 w/ Thompson·5 w/ Fiero
Bernie Sanders
PERSON33 w/ Thompson·4 w/ Fiero
Southern District of New York
ORGANIZATION32 w/ Thompson·4 w/ Fiero
DB
Doug Band
PERSON31 w/ Thompson·5 w/ Fiero
Reid Weingarten
PERSON31 w/ Thompson·4 w/ Fiero