Back to Network
5
Shared Docs
5
Same-Page
9 / 5
Mentions
Document Mentions (5 shared documents)
3 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ears found grooming behavior to be a means to "persuade, induce, or entice" minorsto engage in illegal sexual activity. See, e.g., United States v. Thompson, 896 F.3d 155, 173 (2d Cir. 2018) ("Our precedent, however, supports applying a broad definition of enticement in this context: that definition wou
d Cir. 2018) ("Our precedent, however, supports applying a broad definition of enticement in this context: that definition would reasonably include Thompson's grooming of the minor victims to act as he desired with regard to many matters over the months before he made the video."); United States v. Dorv
Fifth Amendment privilege, no shield protects the civil evidence [ ] from compellable production before the grand jury which subpoenaed it"). 4. The Government Did Not Violate Maxwell's Due Process Rights The defendant also claims that the Government's conduct "cannot be squared with elemental due process." (Def. Mot. 3 a
3 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ars found grooming behavior to be a means to "persuade, induce, or entice" minors to engage in illegal sexual activity. See, e.g., United States v. Thompson, 896 F.3d 155, 173 (2d Cir. 2018) ("Our precedent, however, supports applying a broad definition of enticement in this context: that definition wou
d Cir. 2018) ("Our precedent, however, supports applying a broad definition of enticement in this context: that definition would reasonably include Thompson's grooming of the minor victims to act as he desired with regard to many matters over the months before he made the video."); United States v. Dorv
Fifth Amendment privilege, no shield protects the civil evidence [ ] from compellable production before the grand jury which subpoenaed it"). 4. The Government Did Not Violate Maxwell's Due Process Rights The defendant also claims that the Government's conduct "cannot be squared with elemental due process." (Def. Mot. 3 a
3 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ars found grooming behavior to be a means to "persuade, induce, or entice" minors to engage in illegal sexual activity. See, e.g., United States v. Thompson, 896 F.3d 155, 173 (2d Cir. 2018) ("Our precedent, however, supports applying a broad definition of enticement in this context: that definition wou
d Cir. 2018) ("Our precedent, however, supports applying a broad definition of enticement in this context: that definition would reasonably include Thompson's grooming of the minor victims to act as he desired with regard to many matters over the months before he made the video."); United States v. Dorv
Fifth Amendment privilege, no shield protects the civil evidence [ ] from compellable production before the grand jury which subpoenaed it"). 4. The Government Did Not Violate Maxwell's Due Process Rights The defendant also claims that the Government's conduct "cannot be squared with elemental due process." (Def. Mot. 3 a
Sponsored
3 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ars found grooming behavior to be a means to "persuade, induce, or entice" minors to engage in illegal sexual activity. See, e.g., United States v. Thompson, 896 F.3d 155, 173 (2d Cir. 2018) ("Our precedent, however, supports applying a broad definition of enticement in this context: that definition wou
d Cir. 2018) ("Our precedent, however, supports applying a broad definition of enticement in this context: that definition would reasonably include Thompson's grooming of the minor victims to act as he desired with regard to many matters over the months before he made the video."); United States v. Dorv
Fifth Amendment privilege, no shield protects the civil evidence [ ] from compellable production before the grand jury which subpoenaed it"). 4. The Government Did Not Violate Maxwell's Due Process Rights The defendant also claims that the Government's conduct "cannot be squared with elemental due process." (Def. Mot. 3 a
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
d Cir. 2018) ("Our precedent, however, supports applying a broad definition of enticement in this context: that definition would reasonably include Thompson's grooming of the minor victims to act as he desired with regard to many matters over the months before he made the video."); United States v. Dorve
Fifth Amendment privilege, no shield protects the civil evidence [ ] from compellable production before the grand jury which subpoenaed it"). 4. The Government Did Not Violate Maxwell's Due Process Rights The defendant also claims that the Government's conduct "cannot be squared with elemental due process." (Def. Mot. 3 a
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (259)
Entities connected to both Thompson and The Government Did Not Violate
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON193 w/ Thompson·5 w/ The
United States
LOCATION91 w/ Thompson·5 w/ The
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON86 w/ Thompson·5 w/ The
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON80 w/ Thompson·5 w/ The
Julie K. Brown
PERSON71 w/ Thompson·5 w/ The
George Mitchell
PERSON61 w/ Thompson·5 w/ The
Stephen Hawking
PERSON60 w/ Thompson·5 w/ The
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATION60 w/ Thompson·5 w/ The
Virginia Giuffre
PERSON61 w/ Thompson·3 w/ The
Colorado
LOCATION56 w/ Thompson·5 w/ The
Michael Jackson
PERSON56 w/ Thompson·5 w/ The
Chris Tucker
PERSON51 w/ Thompson·5 w/ The
North Carolina
LOCATION51 w/ Thompson·5 w/ The
Michigan
LOCATION52 w/ Thompson·4 w/ The
the Southern District
LOCATION50 w/ Thompson·5 w/ The
MF
Maria Farmer
PERSON43 w/ Thompson·4 w/ The
Bradley Edwards
PERSON42 w/ Thompson·5 w/ The
Minnesota
LOCATION42 w/ Thompson·5 w/ The
Kentucky
LOCATION39 w/ Thompson·5 w/ The
WE
Werner
PERSON39 w/ Thompson·5 w/ The