Back to Network
5
Shared Docs
5
Same-Page
9 / 5
Mentions
Document Mentions (5 shared documents)
3 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ears found grooming behavior to be a means to "persuade, induce, or entice" minorsto engage in illegal sexual activity. See, e.g., United States v. Thompson, 896 F.3d 155, 173 (2d Cir. 2018) ("Our precedent, however, supports applying a broad definition of enticement in this context: that definition wou
d Cir. 2018) ("Our precedent, however, supports applying a broad definition of enticement in this context: that definition would reasonably include Thompson's grooming of the minor victims to act as he desired with regard to many matters over the months before he made the video."); United States v. Dorv
68 F.2d 216, 222 (2d Cir. 1992) (citingLeon , 468 U.S. at 923). The good faith exception analysis applies in the context of court orders. See, e.g., Zodhiates, 901 F.3d at 143 (applying good faith analysis in Fourth Amendment challenge to cell phone location information obtained by subpoena issued pursuan
3 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ars found grooming behavior to be a means to "persuade, induce, or entice" minors to engage in illegal sexual activity. See, e.g., United States v. Thompson, 896 F.3d 155, 173 (2d Cir. 2018) ("Our precedent, however, supports applying a broad definition of enticement in this context: that definition wou
d Cir. 2018) ("Our precedent, however, supports applying a broad definition of enticement in this context: that definition would reasonably include Thompson's grooming of the minor victims to act as he desired with regard to many matters over the months before he made the video."); United States v. Dorv
68 F.2d 216, 222 (2d Cir. 1992) (citing Leon, 468 U.S. at 923). The good faith exception analysis applies in the context of court orders. See, e.g., Zodhiates, 901 F.3d at 143 (applying good faith analysis in Fourth Amendment challenge to cell phone location information obtained by subpoena issued pursuan
3 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ars found grooming behavior to be a means to "persuade, induce, or entice" minors to engage in illegal sexual activity. See, e.g., United States v. Thompson, 896 F.3d 155, 173 (2d Cir. 2018) ("Our precedent, however, supports applying a broad definition of enticement in this context: that definition wou
d Cir. 2018) ("Our precedent, however, supports applying a broad definition of enticement in this context: that definition would reasonably include Thompson's grooming of the minor victims to act as he desired with regard to many matters over the months before he made the video."); United States v. Dorv
68 F.2d 216, 222 (2d Cir. 1992) (citing Leon, 468 U.S. at 923). The good faith exception analysis applies in the context of court orders. See, e.g., Zodhiates, 901 F.3d at 143 (applying good faith analysis in Fourth Amendment challenge to cell phone location information obtained by subpoena issued pursuan
Sponsored
3 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ars found grooming behavior to be a means to "persuade, induce, or entice" minors to engage in illegal sexual activity. See, e.g., United States v. Thompson, 896 F.3d 155, 173 (2d Cir. 2018) ("Our precedent, however, supports applying a broad definition of enticement in this context: that definition wou
d Cir. 2018) ("Our precedent, however, supports applying a broad definition of enticement in this context: that definition would reasonably include Thompson's grooming of the minor victims to act as he desired with regard to many matters over the months before he made the video."); United States v. Dorv
68 F.2d 216, 222 (2d Cir. 1992) (citing Leon, 468 U.S. at 923). The good faith exception analysis applies in the context of court orders. See, e.g., Zodhiates, 901 F.3d at 143 (applying good faith analysis in Fourth Amendment challenge to cell phone location information obtained by subpoena issued pursuan
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
d Cir. 2018) ("Our precedent, however, supports applying a broad definition of enticement in this context: that definition would reasonably include Thompson's grooming of the minor victims to act as he desired with regard to many matters over the months before he made the video."); United States v. Dorve
68 F.2d 216, 222 (2d Cir. 1992) (citing Leon, 468 U.S. at 923). The good faith exception analysis applies in the context of court orders. See, e.g., Zodhiates, 901 F.3d at 143 (applying good faith analysis in Fourth Amendment challenge to cell phone location information obtained by subpoena issued pursuan
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (259)
Entities connected to both Thompson and Zodhiates
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON193 w/ Thompson·5 w/ Zodhiates
United States
LOCATION91 w/ Thompson·5 w/ Zodhiates
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON86 w/ Thompson·5 w/ Zodhiates
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON80 w/ Thompson·5 w/ Zodhiates
Julie K. Brown
PERSON71 w/ Thompson·5 w/ Zodhiates
George Mitchell
PERSON61 w/ Thompson·5 w/ Zodhiates
Stephen Hawking
PERSON60 w/ Thompson·5 w/ Zodhiates
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATION60 w/ Thompson·5 w/ Zodhiates
Virginia Giuffre
PERSON61 w/ Thompson·3 w/ Zodhiates
Colorado
LOCATION56 w/ Thompson·5 w/ Zodhiates
Michael Jackson
PERSON56 w/ Thompson·5 w/ Zodhiates
Chris Tucker
PERSON51 w/ Thompson·5 w/ Zodhiates
North Carolina
LOCATION51 w/ Thompson·5 w/ Zodhiates
Michigan
LOCATION52 w/ Thompson·4 w/ Zodhiates
the Southern District
LOCATION50 w/ Thompson·5 w/ Zodhiates
MF
Maria Farmer
PERSON43 w/ Thompson·4 w/ Zodhiates
Bradley Edwards
PERSON42 w/ Thompson·5 w/ Zodhiates
Minnesota
LOCATION42 w/ Thompson·5 w/ Zodhiates
Kentucky
LOCATION39 w/ Thompson·5 w/ Zodhiates
WE
Werner
PERSON39 w/ Thompson·5 w/ Zodhiates