Epstein Secrets

The Times says the letter, "which Mr. Trump's lawyers wrote to the federal judge in Manhattan, was in response to a filing from prosecutors in Mr. Vance's office, who argued last week that they had wide legal basis to subpoena eight years of the president's tax records and other financial documents."

inue producing documents to the committee on a rolling basis." The Federalist (8/10, Osburn, 126K) points out "the letter also addressed a weekend Washington Post op-ed by Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., in which he claimed that `disinformation and deception are gaining a toehold in Congress' as Johnson moves forw

nvestigation and congressional oversight, a shameless abuse of the presidential pardon power." Trump's statement accompanying his move, according to Vance, "is a transparent effort to convince his supporters that his access to power should not be constrained by his oath to uphold the Constitution." Va

Michael Flynn." Graham said over the weekend he would grant a request from Democrats for Mueller testify. His statement "came after Mueller wrote a Washington Post op-ed in which he defended his nearly two-year investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election and his office's prosecution of Trump confida

t Harvey Weinstein" in February, Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance Jr. "still has not said whether he is seeking re-election." The Times says Vance "remains politically vulnerable: He is facing a growing list of emboldened challengers, including two civil rights lawyers, an assemblyman and a for

ause an inflammatory and factually incorrect White House statement attacked his prosecution of President Donald Trump's ally Roger Stone." Mueller's Washington Post op-ed on Saturday...came after members of the special counsel's team had urged him to say something. The sources "said Mueller decided not to speak after

The Times says the letter, "which Mr. Trump's lawyers wrote to the federal judge in Manhattan, was in response to a filing from prosecutors in Mr. Vance's office, who argued last week that they had wide legal basis to subpoena eight years of the president's tax records and other financial documents."

inue producing documents to the committee on a rolling basis." The Federalist (8/10, Osburn, 126K) points out "the letter also addressed a weekend Washington Post op-ed by Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., in which he claimed that `disinformation and deception are gaining a toehold in Congress' as Johnson moves forw