Epstein Secrets

RIVATE SCHOOL SEWELL JR,W L BIDWELL,BENNETT E KEELER,RICHARD I WEHMAN,RICHARD

GORDON,STANLEY W STUPP,JACK MORRIS,JULIAN C POISSON,A J PRESSLY,MARY KHA

tes, 552 U.S. 85 (2007) 15 Peugh v. United States, 569 U.S. 530 (2013) 1, 4 Stinson v. United States, 508 U.S. 36 (1993) 14 United States v. Bennett, 37 F.3d 687 (1st Cir. 1994) 8 United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005) 4 United States v. Bronneyer, 699 F.3d 265 (2d Cir. 2012) 12, 13

2d Cir. 2010) 15 United States v. Gigante, 94 F.3d 53 (2d Cir. 1996) 7 United States v. Harris, 79 F.3d 223 (2d Cir. 1996) 3 United States v. Julian, 427 F.3d 471 (7th Cir. 2005) 3, 4 EFTA00156339 United States v. McGrain, No. 6:20-cr-06113 (EAW), 2022 WL 287350 (W.D.N.Y. Feb. 1, 2022) 13

997); United States v. Campbell, 49 F.3d 1079, 1083.84 (5th Cir.1995); United States v. El- lis, 935 F.2d 385, 390 (1st Cir.1991); United States v. Bennett, 364 F.2d 77, 79 (4th Cir.1966). These verbal formulas are strained; the courts turn handsprings trying to define "dominant" as if it were a statu

mpelling," "predominat[ing]," "motivating," not "incidental," or not "an incident" to the defendant's purpose in traveling. E.g., United States v. Julian, 427 F.3d 471, 485 (7th Cir.2005); United States R Hitt, supra, 473 F.3d at 152; United States v. Hayward, 359 F.3d 631, 637-38 (3d Cir.2004); Uni