Epstein Secrets

Not Consummated Sling U.S. I Curtin, 443 F.3d 1084 (9° Cir. 2006) Internet See 2007 U.S. App LEXIS 12110 (9° Cir. 2007) supra. Stine U.S. I Anderson, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 11856 (96 Cir. 2007) Unpublished Internet Online Internet chat, no specific information available. Conviction affirmed.

d no violation of 2422(b) & 2423 because no actual minor; court agrees and defendant's motion to dismiss is granted based on Showed up at meeting Helder. U.S. I Helder, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS Internet No information available. Court held that 2422(b) requires actual 2422(b) Sting 38874 (W.D. Mo

red By: NJB :AIR Name of oRROWER(S) Jeffrey E. Epstein ORIGINAL DATE First Request MAILINGADDRESS 457 Madison Ave. 4th Floor OFFICER H. thy Anderson, Jr. New York, NY 10020 OFFIaR V 1 REFERRING OFFICER Nancy Bruno PHONE LOAN GRADE 3 r AX ID V(S) OBLIGOR NUMBER ItELAten ,m, AORROWERS N

(learn issued by Issuing Financial Institution (issuer). Each party that applies for .aVISA Business Card is referred to in these regulations as a Helder. Issuer shall establish an account-lor . each person designated by Holder as an authorized user (-Authorized User7). Holder consents and agrees to

) No Information U.S. v. Curtin, 443 F.3d 1084 (9th Cir. 2006) Internet See 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 12110 (9'h Cir. 2007) supra. • Sting US. v. Anderson, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 11856 (9'h Cir. 2007) Unpublished Internet . Online chat, no specific information available; conviction affirmed. 2422(6

ct. Defendant claimed no violation of 2422(b) & 2423 because no actual minor; court agrees and defendant's motion to dismiss is granted based on Helder. 2422(b); 2423(b) Not Consummated • • Showed up at meeting Sting 64 EFTA01729548 egIllit 1 CASES, --- Fs ILI - -- ' enc: , , • . -CR

No Information U.S. v. Curtin, 443 F.3d 1084 (9th Cir. 2006) Internet See 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 12110 (9th Cir. 2007) supra. .5ths -i U.S. v. Anderson, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 11856 (9th Cir. 2007) Unpublished Internet Online chat, no specific information available; conviction affirmed. 2422(6)

ct. Defendant claimed no violation of 2422(b) & 2423 because no actual minor; court agrees and defendant's motion to dismiss is granted based on Helder. 2422(b); 2423(b) Not Consummated Showed up at meeting Sting 64 EFTA00079477 COURT CASES , FAC:ILITY FACTS/COMMUNICATION CHARGE U.S. v.

Not Consummated Sting U.S.. Curtin, 443 F.3d 1084 (9i° Cir. 2006) Internet See 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 12110 (9th Cir. 2007) supra. Sting U.S. I Anderson, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 11856 (9th Cir. 2007) Unpublished Internet Online Internet chat, no specific information available. Conviction affirmed.

no violation of 2422(b) & 2423 because no actual minor, court agrees and defendant's motion to dismiss is granted based on Showed up at meeting Helder. U.S. I Helder. Internet No information available. 2422(b) 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS Sting Court held that 2422(b) requires actual 38874 (W.D. Mo