Epstein Secrets

1). "[T]here is no issue for trial unless there is sufficient evidence favoring the non- moving party for a jury to return a verdict for that party." Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 249, 106 S. Ct. 2505, 91 L. Ed. 2d 202 (1986). [HN14] "[Alt the summary judgment stage the judge's function i

IDENTIAL DB-SDNY-0020037 EFTA_OOI 67781 EFTA01295878 Page 19 2014 V.I. LEXIS 45, *; 61 V.I. 13, ** expressly define a marital homestead, both the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit and the Appellate Division of the United States District Court for the Virgin Islands have interpreted § 2305(a), (c) to hold

court's task is not to "weigh the evidence and determine the truth of the matter but to determine whether thre is a genuine issue for trial." I Anderson Liberty Lobby, Inc, 477 U.S. 242, 249, 106 S.Ct. 2605, 91 L.Ed.2d 202 (1986). Summary judgment is inappropriate if, resolving all ambiguities and

ier's Office on 4/14/98. (emil) (Entered: 04/14/1998) 05/21/1998 50 ORDER, Fisher seeks a stay of entry of judgment pending appeal of my ruling to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. Considering the factors set forth in this order in light of the facts of this case I conclude that a stay is not warranted

porting its version of the material facts or to refute the moving party's contention that the facts entitle it to judgment as a matter of law. See Anderson, 477 U.S. at 256-257, 106 S.Ct. 2505. The Court need not accept mere conclu- sory allegations, whether they are made in the complaint or a sworn s

nvicted, which he states was at the latest 1996. 1. Criminal conviction as a prerequi- site to a civil suit 117-201 Neither the Supreme Court nor the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit has provided any guid- ance regarding this particular statute. Thus, in order to determine this question of first impressio