Epstein Secrets

ls Court Pares Back Federal Anti-Riot Act. Politico <https://www.politico.com/news/2020/08/24/court-pares-back-federal-anti-riot-act-400999> (8/24, Gerstein, 4.29M) reports a federal appeals court has "narrowed an anti-riot law the Trump administration is wielding to bring federal charges against individ

s to facilities." Lynch asked, "Will you put the high-speech machines back?" DeJoy "curtly responded," "No, I will not." Later in the hearing, Rep. Ro Khanna (D-CA) asked "what's the harm" in restoring the machines. DeJoy "didn't want to entertain the question, arguing Congress would not be able to give t

supporters, who he says have thrown objects at police and damaged police vehicles." Appeals Court Pares Back Federal Anti-Riot Ad. Politico (8/24, Gerstein, 4.29M) reports a federal appeals court has "narrowed an anti-riot law the Trump administration is wielding to bring federal charges against individ

es to facilities." Lynch asked, "Will you put the high-speech machines back?" DeJoy "curtly responded," "No, I will not." Later in the hearing, Rep. Ro Khanna (D-CA) asked "what's the harm" in restoring the machines. DeJoy "didn't want to entertain the question, arguing Congress would not be able to give

he says have thrown objects at police and damaged police vehicles." EFTA01658430 Appeals Court Pares Back Federal Anti-Riot Act. Politico (8/24, Gerstein, 4.29M) reports a federal appeals court has "narrowed an anti-riot law the Trump administration is wielding to bring federal charges against individ

s." Lynch asked, "Will you put the high-speech machines back?" DeJoy EFTA01658451 "curtly responded," "No, I will not." Later in the hearing, Rep. Ro Khanna (D-CA) asked "what's the harm" in restoring the machines. DeJoy "didn't want to entertain the question, arguing Congress would not be able to give