Epstein Secrets

LIAN COURT MGMT INC IRVINE,HORACE H CALLAHAM,RICHARD P HAFT,ALLISON ROGERS MCCAN

HN J COON,MILES GARVY,ROBERT GELICKMAN,DONALD COOPER,J P POHLMANN,BURT

ry, func- tions, the Court must decide whether the actions involved an element of choice or judgment based on considerations of public policy. See Callahan v. United States, 329 F.Supp2d 404, 408 (S.D.N.Y.2004) (inter- preting FTCA); Berkovitz v. United States, 486 U.S. 531, 536, 108 S.Ct. 1954, 100

A case that the CIA had no authority and therefore no discretion to open U.S. first class mail departing for and arriving from the Soviet Union); Glickman v. United States, 626 F.Supp• 171, 175 (S.D.N.Y.1985) (finding in FTCA case that CIA agent's secret administra- tion of LSD to plaintiff was not di

FTCA case that the CIA had no authority and therefore no discretion to open U.S. first class mail departing for and arriving from the Soviet Union); Glickman v. United States, 626 F.Supp. 171, 175 (S.D.N.Y.1985) (finding in FTCA ease that CIA agent’s secret administra- tion of LSD to plaintiff was not disc

ionary func- tions, the Court must decide whether the actions involved an element of choice or judgment based on considerations of public policy. See Callahan v. United States, 329 F.Supp.2d 404, 408 (S.D.N.Y.2004) (inter- preting FTCA); Berkowitz v. United States, 486 U.S. 531, 536, 108 S.Ct. 1954, 100 L.E