Epstein Secrets

LIAN COURT MGMT INC IRVINE,HORACE H CALLAHAM,RICHARD P HAFT,ALLISON ROGERS MCCAN

ROSENFELD,MARC COCHRANE,MARY M BURDETT,DR ARTHUR C HAUSTRUP DEV CORP PHILL

ry, func- tions, the Court must decide whether the actions involved an element of choice or judgment based on considerations of public policy. See Callahan v. United States, 329 F.Supp2d 404, 408 (S.D.N.Y.2004) (inter- preting FTCA); Berkovitz v. United States, 486 U.S. 531, 536, 108 S.Ct. 1954, 100

s subsequent decision in Kilbunz v. Socialist People's Libyan Arab Jamahiriya, 376 F.3d 1123 (D.C.Cir.2004), effectively overrules the holding in Burnett IL See Kilburn, 376 F.3d at 1129 (evaluating a claim under § 1605(a)(7) and holding the requirement for jurisdictional causation was proximate cau

L CRIME & CORPORATE SCANDALS Pritzker: Illinois House Speaker Has To Step Down If Corruption Allegations Are True. The AP (7/17, Burnett, O'Connor, Callahan) reports Illinois Gov. J.B. Pritzker (D) "said Friday that Illinois House Speaker Michael Madigan `must resign' if allegations of corruption are tru

sentence was the result of an "investigation that led to the arrest of DeAngelo Freeman, a then- Hampton police detective who was accused of giving Burnett the name of a confidential informant." That informant "was cooperating with the FBI." The Augusta (M Free Press (7/18), the WTKR-TV Norfolk, VA (7

enewal pending con- clusion of jurisdictional discovery on that issue, © & KEY NUMBER SYSTEM 40oms In re: TERRORIST ATTACKS ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2001 Burnett v. Al Baraka Inv. & Dev. Corp. Ashton v. Al Qaeda Islamic Army Tremsky v. Qsama Bin Laden Salvo v. Al Qaeda Islamic Army Burnett v. Al Baraka Inv. &

(S.D.N.Y.). Plaintiffs in these cases filed consolidated responses to Prince Sultan’s and Prince Turki’s motions. In Plaintiffs’ words, the New York Burnett action is materially identical to the D.C. Burnett action and was filed as a “prophylactic’’ measure in the event the D.C. court found that it lacked

ionary func- tions, the Court must decide whether the actions involved an element of choice or judgment based on considerations of public policy. See Callahan v. United States, 329 F.Supp.2d 404, 408 (S.D.N.Y.2004) (inter- preting FTCA); Berkowitz v. United States, 486 U.S. 531, 536, 108 S.Ct. 1954, 100 L.E