Epstein Secrets

ues in this appeal. We review de novo whether we have jurisdiction to decide this interlocutory appeal before addressing the merits. United States. Cartwright, 413 F.3d 1295, 1299 (11th Cir. 2005). We also review de novo the interpretation of the Federal Rules of Evidence. See United States I Campo, 459 F

ppeals by claimants of a privilege in 10 EFTA00209394 Case: 13-12923 Date ITIsicloDUtp/2014 Page: 11 of 23 some civil proceedings. See Castle. Sangamo Weston, Inc., 744 F.2d 1464, 1465- 66 (11th Cir. 1984) (exercising jurisdiction because the appellant "claims a privilege of non-disclosure relating to mat

ues in this appeal. We review de novo whether we have jurisdiction to decide this interlocutory appeal before addressing the merits. United States. Cartwright, 413 F.3d 1295, 1299 (11th Cir. 2005). We also review de novo the interpretation of the Federal Rules of Evidence. See United States I Campo, 459 F

ppeals by claimants of a privilege in 10 EFTA00209435 Case: 13-12923 Date ITIsicloDUtp/2014 Page: 11 of 23 some civil proceedings. See Castle. Sangamo Weston, Inc., 744 F.2d 1464, 1465- 66 (11th Cir. 1984) (exercising jurisdiction because the appellant "claims a privilege of non-disclosure relating to mat

s in this appeal. We review de novo whether we have jurisdiction to decide this interlocutory appeal before addressing the merits. United States v. Cartwright, 413 F.3d 1295, 1299 (11th Cir. 2005). We also review de novo the interpretation of the Federal Rules of Evidence. See United States v. Campa, 459

eals by claimants of a privilege in 10 EFTA00209641 Case: 13-12923 Date Filed: 04/18/2014 Page: 11 of 23 some civil proceedings. See Castle v. Sangamo Weston, Inc., 744 F.2d 1464, 1465- 66 (11th Cir. 1984) (exercising jurisdiction because the appellant "claims a privilege of non-disclosure relating to mat

ues in this appeal. We review de novo whether we have jurisdiction to decide this interlocutory appeal before addressing the merits. United States. Cartwright, 413 F.3d 1295, 1299 (11th Cir. 2005). We also review de novo the interpretation of the Federal Rules of Evidence. See United States I Campa, 459 F

peals by claimants of a privilege in 10 EFTA00209750 Case: 13-12923 Date Filed: 04/18/2014 Page: 11 of 23 some civil proceedings. See Castle'. Sangamo Weston, Inc., 744 F.2d 1464, 1465- 66 (11th Cir. 1984) (exercising jurisdiction because the appellant "claims a privilege of non-disclosure relating to mat