Epstein Secrets

g Plaintiffs to bear the burden to prove proper service. See Robles-Martinez v. Diaz, Reus & Targ, LLP, 88 So. 3d 177 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011); Koster v. Sullivan, 160 So. 3d 385, 388 (Fla. 2015). I. Plaintiffs Have De Facto Confessed That They Utilized the Wrong Substitute Service of Process Statute Buried

r Authorities iii EFTA00808438 PREFACE Appellant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, was the Defendant below and will be referred to in this brief as "Epstein." Appellees, JEAN-LUC BRUNEL, individually, and MC2 MODEL & TALENT MIAMI, LLC, were the Plaintiffs below and will be referred to in this brief as "Plaintiffs"

(and ulti. mately decisive in my mind) that there is no record of the terms of the agreement. 4. This is despite the fart that a letter from Mr. Sullivan was introduced in which he asked a state prosecutor to consider the fact that Harvey had cooperated with both the U.S. Attorney and the Drug Enfor

Adam Augustine Caner, Law Office of Adam A. Carter, Washington, DC, for Appellant. Neil Matthew Corwin, U.S. Attorney's Office, New York, NY, for Appellees. Before: and ROGERS, Circuit Judges, SIIIMnior Circuit Judge. JUDGMENT PER CURIAM. "1 This case was considered on the record from O 2007 Thom

nly by some appraisal and accommod- ation of the competing demands of the state and na- tional interests involved." Southern Pac. Ca I Ar- iz. a rel. Sullivan. 325 U.S. 761, 768-69, 65 S.Ct. 1515, 89 L.Ed. 1915 (1945). •1114 Clark's case illustrates the predominance of national interests and the absence

porated, Arthur Young & Company, Northwestern National Bank, Hospital Authority No. 1 of Sarpy County, Nebraska and Midlands Com- munity Hospital, Appellees. No. 77-1923. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted April 14, 1978. Decided June 9, 1978. Purchaser of corporate bonds brou