Epstein Secrets

d 899 (6th Cir.). cert. denied. 423 U.S. 930.96 S. Ct. 280.46 L. Ed. 2d 258 (1975); members of a group advocating an unpopular position. Puentes v. Sullivan. 425 F. Supp. 249 (W.D.Tex.1977); laborers who are not members of a union. Scott v. Moore. 461 F. Supp. 224 (E.D.Tex.1978): members of the teaching

lass-based animus against him as a podiatrist. This discrimination is not actionable under the cases heretofore construing the reach of § 1985(3): Federal Courts have recognized that those who are discriminated against because of political views or associations fall with (sic) the protective scope of Section

899 (6th Cir.). cert. denied, 423 U.S. 930, 96 S. Ct. 280, 46 L. Ed. 2d 258 (1975); members of a group advocating an urpopular position, Puentes v. Sullivan. 425 F. Supp. 249 (W.D.Tex.1977); laborers who are not members of a union, Scott v. Moore, 461 F. Supp. 224 (E.D.Tex.1978): members of the teaching

lass-based animus against him as a podiatrist. This discrimination is not actionable under the cases heretofore construing the reach of § 1985(3): Federal Courts have recognized that those who are discriminated against because of political views or associations fall with (sic) the protective scope of Section

(and ulti. mately decisive in my mind) that there is no record of the terms of the agreement. 4. This is despite the fart that a letter from Mr. Sullivan was introduced in which he asked a state prosecutor to consider the fact that Harvey had cooperated with both the U.S. Attorney and the Drug Enfor

branch from fling indictment. Reversed and remanded. al on Count Five should be reversed. EFTA00191797 178 442 FEDERAL REPORTER, 3d SERIES 1. Federal Courts er•754.1, 814.1 District court's grant or denial of per- manent injunction is reviewed for abuse of discretion, while its underlying legal con- clu