9
Shared Docs
9
Same-Page
9 / 11
Mentions
on to kill. CNN (07/27, Valle, Sanchez, Mascarenhas), New York Times (07/27, Smith), USA TODAY (07/27, Baldas, Thronton, Arshad), Daily Mail (07/27, Griffith), Detroit Free Press (07/27, Baldas, Kaufman, Beck), The Daily Beast (07/27, Ramirez), CBS News (07/27, Staff Writer) and Independent (07/27, Grazis
hon, who called their sentences "unduly harsh and unjust" and criticized the FBI's role in the case. According to the article, EFTA00160476 Judge McMahon accused the government and the FBI of using an informant to instigate the plot, calling the men "hapless, easily manipulated and penurious petty cri
lving a plot to attack New York synagogues and shoot down National Guard planes, have been ordered to be released from prison by U.S. District Judge Colleen McMahon, who called their sentences "unduly harsh and unjust" and criticized the FBI's role in the case. According to the article, EFTA00160476 Judge McM
n to kill. CNN (07/27, Valle, Sanchez, Mascarenhas), New York Times (07/27, Smith), USA TODAY (07/27, Baldas, Thronton, Arshad), Daily Mail (07/27, Griffith), Detroit Free Press (07/27, Baldas, Kaufman, Beck), The Daily Beast (07/27, Ramirez), CBS News (07/27, Staff Writer) and Independent (07/27, Grazis
ge Colleen McMahon, who called their sentences "unduly harsh and unjust" and criticized the FBI's role in the case. According to the article, Judge McMahon accused the government and the FBI of using an informant to instigate the plot, calling the men "hapless, easily manipulated and penurious petty cr
ving a plot to attack New York synagogues and shoot down National Guard planes, have been ordered to be released from prison by U.S. District Judge Colleen McMahon, who called their sentences "unduly harsh and unjust" and criticized the FBI's role in the case. According to the article, Judge McMahon accused the
tation does not necessarily require enticement, and likewise enticement to travel does not necessarily require transportation. See United States v. Griffith, No. 99 Cr. 786 (HB), 2000 WL 1253265, at *4 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 5, 2000) (denying post-trial motion to dismiss as multiplicitous 18 U.S.C. § 2422 tran
e this is fine for you to disclose this in formation to the government based on the validly issued grand jury subpoena"); cf. (id. at 4 (Chief Judge McMahon describing Chemical Bank as saying "the proper procedure [for the production of documents] is for somebody to make a motion to be relieved from the
00099955 United States v. Green, 981 F.3d 945 (11th Cir. 2020) 124 United States v. Greer, 956 F. Supp. 525 (D. Vt. 1997) 72 United States v. Griffith, No. 99 Cr. (HB), 2000 WL 1253265 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 5, 2000) 264 United States v. Guerrier, 18 Cr. 284 (JSR) 286 United States v. Guzman, 337 F.
der is unreasonable where, as here, the protective order is on its face temporary or limited." (Id. at 3-4). 6. Proceedings before a. Chief Judge McMahon Mich 26,2019 Hearing Judge Sweet passed away in March 2019 before ruling on the Government's application. After Judge Sweet's death, but before the
tation does not necessarily require enticement, and likewise enticement to travel does not necessarily require transportation. See United States v. Griffith, No. 99 Cr. 786 (HB), 2000 WL 1253265, at *4 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 5, 2000) (denying post-trial motion to dismiss as multiplicitous 18 U.S.C. § 2422 tran
Judge Netbum, who had not yet ruled on the Government's other application in Jane Doe 43 v. Epstein, et at, 17 Civ. 0616 (JGK) (SN), of Chief Judge McMahon's decision via a pane and sealed letter. (Def. Mot. 3, Ex. I). Subsequently, on April 16, 2019, Judge Netburn denied the Government's application. (
tation does not necessarily require enticement, and likewise enticement to travel does not necessarily require transportation. See United States v. Griffith, No. 99 Cr. 786 (HB), 2000 WL 1253265, at *4 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 5, 2000) (denying post-trial motion to dismiss as multiplicitous 18 U.S.C. § 2422 tran
Judge Netbum, who had not yet ruled on the Government's other application in Jane Doe 43 v. Epstein, et at, 17 Civ. 0616 (JGK) (SN), of Chief Judge McMahon's decision via a pane and sealed letter. (Def. Mot. 3, Ex. I). Subsequently, on April 16, 2019, Judge Netburn denied the Government's application. (
A00095080 United States v. Green, 981 F.3d 945 (11th Cir. 2020) 87 United States v. Greer, 956 F. Supp. 525 (D. Vt. 1997) 49 United States v. Griffith, 99 Cr. (HB), 2000 WL 1253265 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 5, 2000) 172 United States v. Guzman, 337 F. Supp. 140 (S.D.N.Y. 1972) 208 United States v. Halkb
eedin s before 5. The USAO-SDNY's Sub.. nas and Ex Pane Applications for Materials 66 a. M 68 b. April ', 70 EFTA00095068 c. Chief Judge McMahon's Memorandum and Order 71 7. &OAS% 74 8. Unsealing of Maxwell's Depositions 74 9. The New York Daily News Article 75 B. The Defendant's Sup
tation does not necessarily require enticement, and likewise enticement to travel does not necessarily require transportation. See United States v. Griffith, 99 Cr. 786 (HB), 2000 WL 1253265, at *4 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 5, 2000) (denying post-trial motion to dismiss as multiplicitous 18 U.S.C. § 2422 transpor
eir' ginndell in the altemalEMENty, both Challudge firTihron and rt ige that Martindell applied allialliEleappan under that framewial As chAllige McMahon found, even under the Martindell approach, testimony provided pursuant to a protective order can be divulged to a grand jury if the government estab
tation does not necessarily require enticement, and likewise enticement to travel does not necessarily require transportation. See United States v. Griffith, No. 99 Cr. 786 (HB), 2000 WL 1253265, at *4 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 5, 2000) (denying post-trial motion to dismiss as multiplicitous 18 U.S.C. § 2422 tran
Judge Netbum, who had not yet ruled on the Government's other application in Jane Doe 43 v. Epstein, et at, 17 Civ. 0616 (JGK) (SN), of Chief Judge McMahon's decision via a pane and sealed letter. (Def. Mot. 3, Ex. I). Subsequently, on April 16, 2019, Judge Netburn denied the Government's application. (
Entities connected to both Griffith and Colleen McMahon

Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON
United States
LOCATION
Julie K. Brown
PERSON
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATIONthe Southern District
LOCATION
Prince Andrew
PERSONMartin Weinberg
PERSONFBI
ORGANIZATION
George W. Bush
PERSON
Geoffrey S. Berman
PERSON
David Boies
PERSON
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATIONLeon Black
PERSON
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON
Michael Jackson
PERSON
New York
LOCATIONJane Doe
PERSON
Colorado
LOCATION
Virginia Giuffre
PERSON