Epstein Secrets

's ongoing or prospective investigations or proceedings. See Crooke,. v. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms, 789 F.2d 64, 67 (D.C. Cir. 1986); New York Times Co. v. Dep't of Justice, No. 14 Civ. 03776 (AT) (SN), 2016 WL 5946711, at *7 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 18, 2016) ("NY Times"). Moreover, Exemption 7(A) permits the

aintiff stating that it was withholding records pursuant to exemptions 3, 5, 6, 7(A), 7(C), 7(D), and 7(E). These documents are not described on the Vaughn Index because that would reveal the number of pages being withheld categorically, and therefore, they are not being specifically discussed in this

other words, Exemption 7(A) in not included in the face of the documents that were processed prior to July 2019, but the Exemption is noted on the Vaughn Index. Seidel Decl. ¶ 48, Ex. EE. After Epstein's arrest, the FBI confirmed that the additional release of responsive material could negatively imp

imes Co. v. Dep't of Def., 499 F. Supp. 2d 501 (S.D.N.Y. 2007) 8 N.Y. Times Co. v. Dep't of Justice, 2016 WL 5946711 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 18, 2016) 3 New York Times Co. v. Dep't of Justice, 390 F. Supp. 3d 499, 512 (S.D.N.Y. 2019) 3 N.Y. Times Co. v. Dep't of Health and Human Servs., 2021 U.S. Dist. Lexis 6267 (S

eland Sec., 852 F. Supp. 2d 66, 80 (D.D.C. 2012) ("Where an agency has publicly disclosed information that is similar to what is being withheld, its Vaughn submission must be `sufficiently detailed' to distinguish the withheld information from the public information."). CONCLUSION For the foregoing re

imes Co. v. Dep't of Def., 499 F. Supp. 2d 501 (S.D.N.Y. 2007) 8 N.Y. Times Co. v. Dep't of Justice, 2016 WL 5946711 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 18, 2016) 3 New York Times Co. v. Dep't of Justice, 390 F. Supp. 3d 499, 512 (S.D.N.Y. 2019) 3 N.Y. Times Co. v. Dep't of Health and Human Servs., 2021 U.S. Dist. Lexis 6267 (S

eland Sec., 852 F. Supp. 2d 66, 80 (D.D.C. 2012) ("Where an agency has publicly disclosed information that is similar to what is being withheld, its Vaughn submission must be `sufficiently detailed' to distinguish the withheld information from the public information."). CONCLUSION For the foregoing re

imes Co. v. Dep't of Def., 499 F. Supp. 2d 501 (S.D.N.Y. 2007) 8 N.Y. Times Co. v. Dep't of Justice, 2016 WL 5946711 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 18, 2016) 3 New York Times Co. v. Dep't of Justice, 390 F. Supp. 3d 499, 512 (S.D.N.Y. 2019) 3 N.Y. Times Co. v. Dep't of Health and Human Servs., 2021 U.S. Dist. Lexis 6267 (S

eland Sec., 852 F. Supp. 2d 66, 80 (D.D.C. 2012) ("Where an agency has publicly disclosed information that is similar to what is being withheld, its Vaughn submission must be `sufficiently detailed' to distinguish the withheld information from the public information."). CONCLUSION For the foregoing re