Epstein Secrets

imes Co. v. Dep't of Def., 499 F. Supp. 2d 501 (S.D.N.Y. 2007) 8 N.Y. Times Co. v. Dep't of Justice, 2016 WL 5946711 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 18, 2016) 3 New York Times Co. v. Dep't of Justice, 390 F. Supp. 3d 499, 512 (S.D.N.Y. 2019) 3 N.Y. Times Co. v. Dep't of Health and Human Servs., 2021 U.S. Dist. Lexis 6267 (S

2020) 9 Neb. Press Ass 'n v. Stuart, 427 U.S. 539 (1976) 4, 5 ii EFTA00105601 Case 1:20-cv-00833-PAE Document 42 Filed 02/10/21 Page 4 of 15 Radcliffe v. IRS, 536 F. Supp. 2d 423 (S.D.N.Y. 2008) 2 Schiller v. City of New York, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4285 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 19, 2007) 8 Seife v. Dep'

's ongoing or prospective investigations or proceedings. See Crooke,. v. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms, 789 F.2d 64, 67 (D.C. Cir. 1986); New York Times Co. v. Dep't of Justice, No. 14 Civ. 03776 (AT) (SN), 2016 WL 5946711, at *7 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 18, 2016) ("NY Times"). Moreover, Exemption 7(A) permits the

nds of investigatory records .. . would generally interfere with enforcement proceedings." Robbins Tire, 437 U.S. at 236 (quotation marks omitted); Radcliffe v. IRS, 536 F. Supp. 2d 423, 437 (S.D.N.Y. 2008). The government need only demonstrate a "rational link" between the requested public disclosure and

imes Co. v. Dep't of Def., 499 F. Supp. 2d 501 (S.D.N.Y. 2007) 8 N.Y. Times Co. v. Dep't of Justice, 2016 WL 5946711 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 18, 2016) 3 New York Times Co. v. Dep't of Justice, 390 F. Supp. 3d 499, 512 (S.D.N.Y. 2019) 3 N.Y. Times Co. v. Dep't of Health and Human Servs., 2021 U.S. Dist. Lexis 6267 (S

2020) 9 Neb. Press Ass 'n v. Stuart, 427 U.S. 539 (1976) 4, 5 ii EFTA00071611 Case 1:20-cv-00833-PAE Document 42 Filed 02/10/21 Page 4 of 15 Radcliffe v. IRS, 536 F. Supp. 2d 423 (S.D.N.Y. 2008) 2 Schiller v. City of New York, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4285 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 19, 2007) 8 Seife v. Dep'

011) 19 N.L.R.B v. Robbins Tire & Rubber Co., 437 U.S. 214 (1978) 6 Nat? Archives & Records Admin. v. Favish, 541 U.S. 157 (2004) 11, 13, 14 New York Times Co. v. Dep't of Justice, No. 14 Civ. 03776 (AT) (SN), 2016 WL 5946711 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 18, 2016) 6, 8, 10 New York Times Co. v. Nat'l Aeronautics & Spac

New York Times Co. v. Nat'l Aeronautics & Space Admin., 782 F. Supp. 628 (D.D.C. 1991) 12 NYCLU v. DNS, 771 F. Supp. 2d 289 (S.D.N.Y. 2011) 19 Radcliffe v. IRS, 536 F. Supp. 2d 423 (S.D.N.Y. 2008) 6 Summers v. DOJ, No. CV 98-1837(RWR), 2004 WL 7333532 (D.D.C. Apr. 14, 2004) 14 iii EFTA00071587

t's ongoing or prospective investigations or proceedings. See Crooke,. v. Bureau ofAlcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms, 789 F.2d 64, 67 (D.C. Cir. 1986); New York Times Co. v. Dep't opustice, No. 14 Civ. 03776 (AT) (SN), 2016 WL 5946711, at *7 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 18, 2016) ("NY Times"). Moreover, Exemption 7(A) permits the c

.2d 1088 (D.C. Cir. 1989) 8 Oglesby v. U.S. Army, 920 F.2d 57 (D.C. Cir. 1990) 5 Pinson v. Dept of .htstice, 236 F. Supp. 3d (D.D.C. 2017) 22 Radcliffe v. IRS, 536 F. Supp. 2d 423 (S.D.N.Y. 2008) 7, 8 Renegotiation Bd. v. Grumman Aircraft Eng'g Corp., 421 U.S. 168 (1975) 13 Robbins, Geller, Ru

t's ongoing or prospective investigations or proceedings. See Crooke,. v. Bureau ofAlcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms, 789 F.2d 64, 67 (D.C. Cir. 1986); New York Times Co. v. Dep't opustice, No. 14 Civ. 03776 (AT) (SN), 2016 WL 5946711, at *7 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 18, 2016) ("NY Times"). Moreover, Exemption 7(A) permits the c

.2d 1088 (D.C. Cir. 1989) 8 Oglesby v. U.S. Army, 920 F.2d 57 (D.C. Cir. 1990) 5 Pinson v. Dept of .htstice, 236 F. Supp. 3d (D.D.C. 2017) 22 Radcliffe v. IRS, 536 F. Supp. 2d 423 (S.D.N.Y. 2008) 7, 8 Renegotiation Bd. v. Grumman Aircraft Eng'g Corp., 421 U.S. 168 (1975) 13 Robbins, Geller, Ru

imes Co. v. Dep't of Def., 499 F. Supp. 2d 501 (S.D.N.Y. 2007) 8 N.Y. Times Co. v. Dep't of Justice, 2016 WL 5946711 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 18, 2016) 3 New York Times Co. v. Dep't of Justice, 390 F. Supp. 3d 499, 512 (S.D.N.Y. 2019) 3 N.Y. Times Co. v. Dep't of Health and Human Servs., 2021 U.S. Dist. Lexis 6267 (S

2020) 9 Neb. Press Ass 'n v. Stuart, 427 U.S. 539 (1976) 4, 5 ii EFTA00088562 Case 1:20-cv-00833-PAE Document 42 Filed 02/10/21 Page 4 of 15 Radcliffe v. IRS, 536 F. Supp. 2d 423 (S.D.N.Y. 2008) 2 Schiller v. City of New York, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4285 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 19, 2007) 8 Seife v. Dep'

011) 19 N.L.R.B v. Robbins Tire & Rubber Co., 437 U.S. 214 (1978) 6 Nat? Archives & Records Admin. v. Favish, 541 U.S. 157 (2004) 11, 13, 14 New York Times Co. v. Dep't of Justice, No. 14 Civ. 03776 (AT) (SN), 2016 WL 5946711 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 18, 2016) 6, 8, 10 New York Times Co. v. Nat'l Aeronautics & Spac

New York Times Co. v. Nat'l Aeronautics & Space Admin., 782 F. Supp. 628 (D.D.C. 1991) 12 NYCLU v. DNS, 771 F. Supp. 2d 289 (S.D.N.Y. 2011) 19 Radcliffe v. IRS, 536 F. Supp. 2d 423 (S.D.N.Y. 2008) 6 Summers v. DOJ, No. CV 98-1837(RWR), 2004 WL 7333532 (D.D.C. Apr. 14, 2004) 14 iii EFTA00088608

t's ongoing or prospective investigations or proceedings. See Crooke,. v. Bureau ofAlcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms, 789 F.2d 64, 67 (D.C. Cir. 1986); New York Times Co. v. Dep't opustice, No. 14 Civ. 03776 (AT) (SN), 2016 WL 5946711, at *7 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 18, 2016) ("NY Times"). Moreover, Exemption 7(A) permits the c

.2d 1088 (D.C. Cir. 1989) 8 Oglesby v. U.S. Army, 920 F.2d 57 (D.C. Cir. 1990) 5 Pinson v. Dept of .htstice, 236 F. Supp. 3d (D.D.C. 2017) 22 Radcliffe v. IRS, 536 F. Supp. 2d 423 (S.D.N.Y. 2008) 7, 8 Renegotiation Bd. v. Grumman Aircraft Eng'g Corp., 421 U.S. 168 (1975) 13 Robbins, Geller, Ru

011) 19 N.L.R.B v. Robbins Tire & Rubber Co., 437 U.S. 214 (1978) 6 Nat? Archives & Records Admin. v. Favish, 541 U.S. 157 (2004) 11, 13, 14 New York Times Co. v. Dep't of Justice, No. 14 Civ. 03776 (AT) (SN), 2016 WL 5946711 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 18, 2016) 6, 8, 10 New York Times Co. v. Nat'l Aeronautics & Spac

New York Times Co. v. Nat'l Aeronautics & Space Admin., 782 F. Supp. 628 (D.D.C. 1991) 12 NYCLU v. DNS, 771 F. Supp. 2d 289 (S.D.N.Y. 2011) 19 Radcliffe v. IRS, 536 F. Supp. 2d 423 (S.D.N.Y. 2008) 6 Summers v. DOJ, No. CV 98-1837(RWR), 2004 WL 7333532 (D.D.C. Apr. 14, 2004) 14 iii EFTA00099601