Epstein Secrets

071 (RPP), 1995 WL 329307 (S.D.N.Y. June 1, 19 95) 5 Garcia v. U.S. Dept ofJustice, 181 F. Supp. 2d 356 (S.D.N.Y. 2002) 5 Grand Cent. P .ship v. Cuomo, 166 F.3d 473 (2d Cir. 1999) 13, 14 Hopkins v. U.S. Dept of Housing and Urban Dev., 929 F.2d 81 13 Human Rights Watch v BOP, No. 13-CV-7360 (J

tenson DecL ¶¶ 49. Each set of records satisfies the two-prong test to fall within the scope of the deliberative process privilege. First, prior to Epstekes suicide, BOP made decisions concerning how to house Epstein and whether or not to house him with a celknate. See Christenson DecL ¶¶ 49a, 49d. The i

071 (RPP), 1995 WL 329307 (S.D.N.Y. June 1, 19 95) 5 Garcia v. U.S. Dept ofJustice, 181 F. Supp. 2d 356 (S.D.N.Y. 2002) 5 Grand Cent. P .ship v. Cuomo, 166 F.3d 473 (2d Cir. 1999) 13, 14 Hopkins v. U.S. Dept of Housing and Urban Dev., 929 F.2d 81 13 Human Rights Watch v BOP, No. 13-CV-7360 (J

tenson DecL ¶¶ 49. Each set of records satisfies the two-prong test to fall within the scope of the deliberative process privilege. First, prior to Epstekes suicide, BOP made decisions concerning how to house Epstein and whether or not to house him with a celknate. See Christenson DecL ¶¶ 49a, 49d. The i

071 (RPP), 1995 WL 329307 (S.D.N.Y. June 1, 19 95) 5 Garcia v. U.S. Dept ofJustice, 181 F. Supp. 2d 356 (S.D.N.Y. 2002) 5 Grand Cent. P .ship v. Cuomo, 166 F.3d 473 (2d Cir. 1999) 13, 14 Hopkins v. U.S. Dept of Housing and Urban Dev., 929 F.2d 81 13 Human Rights Watch v BOP, No. 13-CV-7360 (J

tenson DecL ¶¶ 49. Each set of records satisfies the two-prong test to fall within the scope of the deliberative process privilege. First, prior to Epstekes suicide, BOP made decisions concerning how to house Epstein and whether or not to house him with a celknate. See Christenson DecL ¶¶ 49a, 49d. The i