Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
005) 8 Gonzalez v. U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Servs., 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 134482 (S.D.N.Y. July 29, 2020) 2 Grand Central P 'ship, Inc. v. Cuomo, 166 F.3d 473 (2d Cir. 1999). 8 Human Rights Watch v. DOJ Fed. Bureau of Prisons, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 123592 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 16, 2015) 2 Judi
ption 5, the deliberative process privilege "does not operate indiscriminately to shield all decision-making by public officials." N.Y. Times Co. v. Dep't of Def., 499 F. Supp. 2d 501, 514 (S.D.N.Y. 2007). Moreover, the Government's Exemption 5 withholdings cannot survive because BOP has failed to meet
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ional' and `deliberative."' Grand Cent P 'ship v. Cuomo,166 F.3d 473, 482 (2d Cir. 1999) (quoting Renego
2(bX7XC). Under Exemption 7(C), a court again "balance[s] the public interest in disclosure against the [privacy] interest." Associated Press v. US. Dep't of Defense,554 F.3d 274, 284 (2d Cir. 2009). In this analysis, "[t]here is only one relevant public interest, that of opening agency action to the li
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
005) 8 Gonzalez v. U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Servs., 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 134482 (S.D.N.Y. July 29, 2020) 2 Grand Central P 'ship, Inc. v. Cuomo, 166 F.3d 473 (2d Cir. 1999). 8 Human Rights Watch v. DOJ Fed. Bureau of Prisons, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 123592 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 16, 2015) 2 Judi
ption 5, the deliberative process privilege "does not operate indiscriminately to shield all decision-making by public officials." N.Y. Times Co. v. Dep't of Def., 499 F. Supp. 2d 501, 514 (S.D.N.Y. 2007). Moreover, the Government's Exemption 5 withholdings cannot survive because BOP has failed to meet
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
005) 8 Gonzalez v. U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Servs., 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 134482 (S.D.N.Y. July 29, 2020) 2 Grand Central P 'ship, Inc. v. Cuomo, 166 F.3d 473 (2d Cir. 1999). 8 Human Rights Watch v. DOJ Fed. Bureau of Prisons, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 123592 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 16, 2015) 2 Judi
ption 5, the deliberative process privilege "does not operate indiscriminately to shield all decision-making by public officials." N.Y. Times Co. v. Dep't of Def., 499 F. Supp. 2d 501, 514 (S.D.N.Y. 2007). Moreover, the Government's Exemption 5 withholdings cannot survive because BOP has failed to meet
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (57)
Entities connected to both Andrew Cuomo and Dep't
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON285 w/ Andrew·6 w/ Dep't
George W. Bush
PERSON135 w/ Andrew·2 w/ Dep't
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON115 w/ Andrew·2 w/ Dep't
Julie K. Brown
PERSON98 w/ Andrew·5 w/ Dep't
United States
LOCATION90 w/ Andrew·3 w/ Dep't
Harvey Weinstein
PERSON40 w/ Andrew·2 w/ Dep't
PE
Perez
PERSON30 w/ Andrew·3 w/ Dep't
Federal Bureau of Prisons
ORGANIZATION24 w/ Andrew·3 w/ Dep't
CO
Coleman
PERSON21 w/ Andrew·3 w/ Dep't
Alberto Gonzales
PERSON19 w/ Andrew·4 w/ Dep't
SH
Shapiro
PERSON19 w/ Andrew·4 w/ Dep't
The New York Times
ORGANIZATION18 w/ Andrew·4 w/ Dep't
Metropolitan Correctional Center
ORGANIZATION14 w/ Andrew·4 w/ Dep't
Audrey Strauss
PERSON15 w/ Andrew·2 w/ Dep't
Human Rights Watch
ORGANIZATION10 w/ Andrew·4 w/ Dep't
D.C. Cir
ORGANIZATION9 w/ Andrew·4 w/ Dep't
RA
Radcliffe
PERSON9 w/ Andrew·4 w/ Dep't
NT
Nicholas Tartaglione
PERSON9 w/ Andrew·3 w/ Dep't
TV
Timothy Dalton Vaughn
PERSON8 w/ Andrew·4 w/ Dep't
THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY
ORGANIZATION8 w/ Andrew·3 w/ Dep't