Epstein Secrets

n For Time Certain Based on Parallel Civil and Criminal Proceedings with Incorporated Memorandum of Law [D.E. 65], and the recent ruling from Judge Colbath in the related state court cases, Plaintiffs believe that the issues raised in Defendant's Motion to Stay are moot. Dated: June 29, 2009. -4- Podh

vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. C.M.A., Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. JANE DOE, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. Podhurst Orseck, P.A. CASE NO.: 08-CV-80994-MARRA/JOHNSON CASE NO.: 08-CV-80993-MARRA/JOHNSON CASE NO.: 08-CV-80811-MARRA/JOHNSON CASE NO.: 08-CV-80893-MARRA/JOHNSON

t 169 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/22/2009 Page 5 of 8 1. The issuemaybemademoot at a June 25, 2009, hearing before Palm Beach Circuit Court Judge Colbath. 2. This motion is not made for the purpose of delay and should be granted in the interest of equity and fairness. WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs, Jane Do

in this Motion. Mr. Critton advised that the Defendant does not oppose the Motion or the relief sought herein. DATED this 22nd day of June, 2009. Podhurst Orseck, P.A. Respectfully submitted, By: s/Robert C. Josefsberg Robert C. Josefsberg, Bar No. 040856 Katherine W. Ezell, Bar No. 114771 Podhurst Orseck, P.

9, hearing before Palm Beach Circuit Court Judge Colbath. 2. This motion is not made for the purpose of

, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. Podhurst Orseck, P.A. CASE NO.: 08-CV-80811-MARRA/JOHNSON CASE NO.: 0