4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 6
Mentions
f traumatic oats experi- enced in childhood. CMOtiOSAIROM and Cognition. 3. 269-294. Goodman. G.S.. Tart. EP.. Jones. D.P.H., England. P. Pon. L K.. Rudy. L.. & Prado. L. (19924 Testifying in criminal court. Monograph! of the Sawn for Aryan* in CALM DeneMptiond. 5715, Serial No. 229). Have. M.L. 120
eriences of sexual abuse can become inaccessible to con- sciousness. Although core features of stressful events are often panicu- lwly well retained (Christianson. 1992), debate centers on whether, for highly traumatic events, special memory mechanisms supercede normal memory processes. Some researchers argue
actors like event salience and personal rele- vance may facilitate memory retention (e.g., Baker-Ward. Hess. & Flanagan, 1990: Bower & Sivers. 1998; Christianson, 1992). severe abuse, which typically includes invasive sexual contact, force, or both. would be more likely to be remembered than less severe abus
at the anogenital part of the exam was particularly rel- evant or salient for these children or that they were sen- sitized to such contact (Goodman, Rudy, Bottoms, & Aman, 1990). For example, for participants with a child sexual abuse history, the forensic medical exam (i.e., as part of a maltreatme
der the relation of the event to one's life course (Berntsen & Rubin, 2006; Frankenhuis & Weenh, 2013); the emotional or taboo nature of the acts (Christianson, 1992; Goodman et al., 1990); meta-cognitive abilities (Koriat et al., 2000), especially in relation to schema-expected, plausible acts (Pezdek et
opardy in the courtroom: A scientific analysis of chiklren's testimony. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/10180- 000 Christianson, S. A. (1992). Emotional stress and eyewitness memory: A critical review. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 284-309. Connolly, I). A., Chong, K., Cobur
34-009 Page 7 of 8 EFTA_000 10259 EFTA00159907 Memory for Child Sexual Abuse Goodman. C.S.. Taub. E.P.. Jones, D.P.H.. England. P.. Port. LK.. Rudy. L. & Prado. L. (1992). Testifying in criminal court. Mono- graphs of the Society for Research in Child Development. 57(5. Serial No. 229). Haden.
aps because of their salience or distinctiveness. They may activate physiological (e.g., amygrIala; LeDoux, 2000) and behavioral (e.g., rehearsal; Christianson, 1992) responses that help con- solidate or maintain memories, possibly including memories for whole categories of experiences. Moreover, for highly
Taub. E.. Jones. D. P. H.. EngLand, P.. Port, L. Rudy. L. & hack I. (1992). Testifying in criminal cour
d the most important compo- nents of the stressful event, leading to enhanced memory for those components but weaker memory for peripheral details (Christianson, 1992). Forgetting and ermrs still occur. but they typically do so to a lesser extent than for memory of less nega- tive events, even in children (C
Entities connected to both Rudy Giuliani and Christianson

Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON
Prince Andrew
PERSON
George W. Bush
PERSON
George Mitchell
PERSON
Julie K. Brown
PERSON
Michael Cohen
PERSON
New York
LOCATION
Marc Rich
PERSON
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON
Lawrence Krauss
PERSON
Michigan
LOCATIONMaria Farmer
PERSON
Philadelphia
LOCATION
James Baker
PERSON
Hunter Biden
PERSON
Michael Flynn
PERSON
Condoleezza Rice
PERSON
Martha Stewart
PERSON
Vicky Ward
PERSON
Oliver Stone
PERSON