Epstein Secrets

at the anogenital part of the exam was particularly rel- evant or salient for these children or that they were sen- sitized to such contact (Goodman, Rudy, Bottoms, & Aman, 1990). For example, for participants with a child sexual abuse history, the forensic medical exam (i.e., as part of a maltreatme

ng-term remembering, forgetting, and suggestibility. Journal of Egyrimental Child Psychology, 72, 235-270. doi:10.1006/jecp.1999.2491 Quas, J. A., Malloy, L. C., Melinder, A., Goodman, G. S., D'Mello, M., & Schaaf, J. (2007). Developmental differ- ences in the effects of repeated interviews and inter-

ician. An actual legal investigation of acts by the physician might have pro- vided both richer recall and increased event saliency (La Rooy, Katz, Malloy, & Lamb, 2010). That said, a forensic medical examination conducted with children removed from their homes during an ongoing legal investigation o

nd Jury Subpoena, 1 F.3d 87, 93 (2nd Cir. 1993); Rudy-Glanzer v. Glanzer, 232 F.3d 1258, 1263 (9th Cir.

safe harbor of the 5'" Amendment2 ate Ohio v. Reiner, 532 U.S. 17 (1991). 2 See PeLisi v. Bankers Ins. Company 436 So.2d 1099 (Fla. 4d. DCA 1983); Malloy v. Hogan. 84 S.Ct. 1489, 1495 (1964Xthe Fifth Amendment's Self-Incrimination Clause applies to the states through the Due Process Clause of the Fou

early prohibited by the Constitution." DE 480 See Rudy- Glanzer v. Glanzer, 232 F.3d at 1263 (the "privi

Ins. Company, 436 So.2d 1099 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983); Malloy v. Hogan, 84 S.Ct. 1489, 1495 (1964)(the Fifth A

nd Jury Subpoena, 1 F.3d 87, 93 (2nd Cir. 1993); Rudy-Glanzer v. Glanzer, 232 F.3d 1258, 1263 (9th Cir.

e safe harbor of the 5 Amendment.2 See Ohio v. Reiner, 532 U.S. 17(1991). 2 See DeLisi v. Bankers Ins. Company. 436 So.2d 1099 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983); Malloy v. Hogan, 84 S.Ct. 1489, 1495 (1964)(the Fifth Amendment's Self-Incrimination Clause applies to the states through the Due Process Clause of the Fo

ice D. W. W., & Goodman, G. S. (1990). Visiting the wizard: Children's memory of a recurring event. Child Development, 61, 664-680. Goodman, G. S., Rudy, L., Bottoms, B. L., & Aman, C. (1990). Children's concerns and memory: Issues of ecological validity in the study of children's eyewitness testimon

595-613. Goodman, G. S. (2006). Children's eyewitness memory: A modern history and contemporary commentary. Journal of Social Issues, 62, 811-832. Malloy, L., Mitchell, E., Block, S., Quas, J., & Goodman, G. S. (2006). Children's eyewitness memory: Balancing children's needs and defendants' rights whe

ice D. W. W., & Goodman, G. S. (1990). Visiting the wizard: Children's memory of a recurring event. Child Development, 61, 664-680. Goodman, G. S., Rudy, L, Bottoms, B. L., & Aman, C. (1990). Children's concerns and memory: Issues of ecological validity in the study of children's eyewitness testimony

595-613. Goodman, G. S. (2006). Children's eyewitness memory: A modem history and contemporary commentary. Journal of Social Issues, 62, 811-832. Malloy, L., Mitchell, E., Block, S., Quas, J., Sr Goodman, G. S. (2006). Children's eyewitness memory: Balancing children's needs and defendants' rights wh