Epstein Secrets

v. IRS, 536 F. Supp. 2d 423 (S.D.N.Y. 2008) 6 Summers v. DOJ, No. CV 98-1837(RWR), 2004 WL 7333532 (D.

ecords withheld by BOP under Exemption 7 were compiled for law enforcement purposes, thereby satisfying the first prong of the Exemption 7(A) test. See Amnesty Intl USA v. CIA, 728 F. Supp. 2d 479, 525 (S.D.N.Y. 2010); BOP MOL at 8-10. The Times criticizes the Government for arguing that BOP documents—or at least t

v. IRS, 536 F. Supp. 2d 423 (S.D.N.Y. 2008) 6 Summers v. DOJ, No. CV 98-1837(RWR), 2004 WL 7333532 (D.

ecords withheld by BOP under Exemption 7 were compiled for law enforcement purposes, thereby satisfying the first prong of the Exemption 7(A) test. See Amnesty Intl USA v. CIA, 728 F. Supp. 2d 479, 525 (S.D.N.Y. 2010); BOP MOL at 8-10. The Times criticizes the Government for arguing that BOP documents—or at least t

v. IRS, 536 F. Supp. 2d 423 (S.D.N.Y. 2008) 6 Summers v. DOJ, No. CV 98-1837(RWR), 2004 WL 7333532 (D.

ecords withheld by BOP under Exemption 7 were compiled for law enforcement purposes, thereby satisfying the first prong of the Exemption 7(A) test. See Amnesty Intl USA v. CIA, 728 F. Supp. 2d 479, 525 (S.D.N.Y. 2010); BOP MOL at 8-10. The Times criticizes the Government for arguing that BOP documents—or at least t