Epstein Secrets

7,000 emails and the creation of a privilege log, which has been rendered meaningless due to the violation; this task required the time of numerous Farmer Jaffe employees and in total well over 100 hours of time. Fanner Jaffe seeks reimbursement for only a fraction of that time: 40 hours of attorney time at

EMPT OF COURT, TO PERMIT DISCOVERY, TO ASSESS SANCTIONS AND COSTS AND FOR OTHER APPROPRIATE RELIEF Farmer Jaffe Weissing Edwards Fistos & Lehrman ("Farmer Jaffe"), through counsel, hereby files this Summary of Damages in Support of Farmer Jaffe's Motion to Show Cause Why Fowler White and Jeffrey Epstein Sho

one: (561)-659-8300 Fax: (561)-835-8691 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein 5 EFTA00795943 Case 09-34791-R BR Doc 6383 Filed 05/14/18 Page 6 of 6 Phil Burlington, Esq. Nichole J. Segal, Esquire [email protected]; [email protected] Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. 444 W Railroad Avenue, Suite 350 We

rivileged materials for over seven years," Fanner Jaffe said in its motion. "The misappropriation of this information has caused irreparable harm." Farmer Jaffe filed its motion in bankruptcy court in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, in the liquidation case of law firm Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler PA, where Edwards h

er of Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss PA. Edwards is represented by Jack Scarola and David P. Vitale of Seamy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley PA and Phil Burlington and Nichole J. Segal of Burlington & Rockenbach PA. L.M., E.W. and Jane Doc arc represented by Jay Howell of Jay Howell & Associates and Paul G. Ca

MO had ovary rea➢on to 10 12 1 Jaffe, Miming, Edwards, Flacon and Lehrman• -- I believe that this respected is.. firm and these 2 THE COURT: Farmer Jaffe, right? 2 respected lawyers would do exactly what they were 3 MR. SCAROLA: Yes. Pinner Jaffe. 3 told to do. 4 THE COURT: Be can just refer co

ank you. IS there's no need to prove publication. 14 Mr. Burlington? 16 When I say • publication, • I'm talking about 17 MR. BURLINGTON: I'm Phil Burlington, here on 17 the consumption of that information by another la behalf of Brad Edwards. IS party and that party's -- and the effect ca that Is

MO had ovary rea➢on to 10 12 1 Jaffe, Miming, Edwards, Flacon and Lehrman• -- I believe that this respected is.. firm and these 2 THE COURT: Farmer Jaffe, right? 2 respected lawyers would do exactly what they were 3 MR. SCAROLA: Yes. Pinner Jaffe. 3 told to do. 4 THE COURT: Be can just refer co

ank you. IS there's no need to prove publication. 14 Mr. Burlington? 16 When I say • publication, • I'm talking about 17 MR. BURLINGTON: I'm Phil Burlington, here on 17 the consumption of that information by another la behalf of Brad Edwards. IS party and that party's -- and the effect ca that Is

esponses and Objections to the Notices of Taking Video Deposition Duces Tecum of Epstein [DE 6388]. Apparently, their position is that Edwards (and Farmer Jaffe and the Intervenors) are limited to deposition testimony only and have no ability to test the credibility of that sworn testimony through impeachmen

ttorneys for Jeffrey Epstein Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire [email protected]; [email protected] • , P.A. 1400 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein Phil Burlington, Esq. Nichole J. Segal, Esquire ppellateLaw.com Attorneys for Bradley J. Edwards EDWARDS POTTINGER LLC Bradley J. Edwards FLBN 54207 Brittany N