Epstein Secrets

7,000 emails and the creation of a privilege log, which has been rendered meaningless due to the violation; this task required the time of numerous Farmer Jaffe employees and in total well over 100 hours of time. Fanner Jaffe seeks reimbursement for only a fraction of that time: 40 hours of attorney time at

EMPT OF COURT, TO PERMIT DISCOVERY, TO ASSESS SANCTIONS AND COSTS AND FOR OTHER APPROPRIATE RELIEF Farmer Jaffe Weissing Edwards Fistos & Lehrman ("Farmer Jaffe"), through counsel, hereby files this Summary of Damages in Support of Farmer Jaffe's Motion to Show Cause Why Fowler White and Jeffrey Epstein Sho

after "the Epstein lawsuit"). The result of that subpoena was the production from the RRA trustee of approximately 27,000 emails to be delivered to Fanner Jaffe for the review and creation of a privilege log. On November 30, 2010, this Court ordered Epstein to bear the costs of the printing and Bates Number

ollowing results. The subject was followed to a law office of Michael Levin which he stayed for about 30 minutes. Then he drove to the law office of Farmer Jaffe and stayed for about 90 minutes. On Tuesday April 27, 2010 The investigator conducted surveillance from 715am to 730pm, with the following results.

video documentation was obtained throughout the course of this investigation. Based on our observations to date, the subject continues to work for Fanner Jaffe and has contact with at least one other law firm. The subject met with Kenneth Jenne. ENCLOSURES: Video CD Rock Legal Services & Investi a ions In

rivileged materials for over seven years," Fanner Jaffe said in its motion. "The misappropriation of this information has caused irreparable harm." Farmer Jaffe filed its motion in bankruptcy court in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, in the liquidation case of law firm Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler PA, where Edwards h

er Jaffe Wcissing Edwards Fistos & Lehrman PL said in its March 19 motion that recent developments in ongoing litigation between Epstein and former Fanner Jaffe partner Bradley J. Edwards, who represented several of Epstein's victims, showed that Fowler White retained a copy of the confidential documents and

esponses and Objections to the Notices of Taking Video Deposition Duces Tecum of Epstein [DE 6388]. Apparently, their position is that Edwards (and Farmer Jaffe and the Intervenors) are limited to deposition testimony only and have no ability to test the credibility of that sworn testimony through impeachmen

Cause Hearing, as it is Edwards' position that only one (1) day is required. Edwards reasonably believes that this view is shared by, at a minimum, Fanner Jaffe and the Intervenors. Thus, rescheduling will conserve Court resources, as a single day should be sufficient. Conclusion Given the foregoing, Edwar